Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The 7 th International Association for Lichenology <strong>Symposium</strong> 2012<br />
(2A-2-O2) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0177-00001<br />
MAKING SENSE OF CRYPTIC DIVERSITY, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND DIVERSIFICATION IN<br />
LICHEN-FORMING FUNGI - A STUDY OF BROWN PARMELIOID LICHENS<br />
(PARMELIACEAE, ASCOMYCOTA)<br />
Leavitt S. 1 , Chatwin W. 2 , Garcia S. 1 , Esslinger T. E. 3 , Lumbsch T. 1<br />
1 Botany, The Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, United States<br />
2 Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States<br />
3 Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States<br />
While many lichen-forming fungal lineages have geographically restricted distributions, there is<br />
mounting evidence that transoceanic dispersal is common within some lichen associations. However, cryptic<br />
lineages within morphologically and chemically circumscribed taxa likely confound our understanding of the<br />
role of biogeography and long-distance dispersal in many broadly distributed species. In this study we address<br />
species circumscription and biogeographic patterns in two closely related, and notoriously challenging, parmelioid<br />
lichen genera (Melanelixia and Melanohalea) with broad distributions throughout the northern Hemisphere.<br />
Using DNA sequence data from ca. 650 individuals we address current morphological/chemical species<br />
circumscriptions, identify previously unrecognized lineages, and discuss biogeographical patterns. Although<br />
many clades are largely congruent with traditionally circumscribed taxa, some morphologically indistinguishable<br />
groups (cryptic species) are recovered in multiple, distinct genetic lineages in both Melanelixia and Melanohalea.<br />
Strong nodal support and reciprocal monophyly in independent gene trees suggest long-term reproductive<br />
isolation between most lineages. While many lineages are truly widespread and support the hypothesis of<br />
common transoceanic dispersal, a limited number of clades appear to have much more restricted distributional<br />
ranges. We also estimate net diversification rates between Melanelixia and Melanohalea and calculate the difference<br />
between them. Incorporating Bayesian divergence time estimation, we explore potential explanations<br />
for differences in diversification rates and biogeographic patterns.<br />
(2A-2-O3) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0272-00001<br />
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND SPECIES DELIMITATION IN MENEGAZZIA<br />
(PARMELIACEAE)<br />
Tronstad I. K. 1 , Myles B. C. 2 , Grube M. 3 , Bjerke J. 4<br />
1 Tromso University Museum, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway<br />
2 Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Palmerston North, New Zealand<br />
3 Institute for Plant Sciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria<br />
4 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Tromso, Norway<br />
The genus Menegazzia has its main distribution in the Southern Hemisphere and is particularly species-rich<br />
in temperate forests in South America and Oceania and in mountainous regions close to equator. More<br />
than 70 species have been described, but species new to science are still being discovered. Recent comparative<br />
studies have also shown some formerly separated species to be conspecific, which has led to revisions of<br />
distribution maps. In this study Menegazzia specimens from South America, Australasia, North America, and<br />
Europe have been collected for molecular analysis to elucidate the phylogeny of this genus based on three loci<br />
(nuITS, nuLSU and mtSSU). The results suggest that the genus comprises a large proportion of endemic species<br />
and that chemistry is an important character for species delimitation. Further results will be presented, and<br />
some implications for species delimitation within the genus will be discussed.<br />
31<br />
2A-2-O