Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Message - 7th IAL Symposium
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The <strong>7th</strong> International Association for Lichenology <strong>Symposium</strong> 2012<br />
1A: Lichen conservation: concepts and action<br />
(1A – O1) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0133-00001<br />
LICHEN CONSERVATION: FROM ACTIONS TO CONCEPTS AND BACK<br />
Scheidegger C. 1 , Stofer S. 1<br />
1 Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland<br />
In this address we will highlight the various instruments in Conservation Biology and discuss their<br />
applicability for lichens. We will describe some examples of species recovery programs and describe which<br />
information was most helpful to convince local and national stakeholders of the need of lichen conservation<br />
measures. We will stress the importance that data on the lichen’s demography and life-cycle be communicated<br />
to the land-managers in their “language”. For the facilitation of the communication between the different stakeholders,<br />
e.g. land owner, land manager, regional and national conservations agencies, and scientists, a national<br />
data Centre for lichens proved to be very important. Conservation programs were most successful when local<br />
stakeholders took the initiative and developed conservation acting plans for species or lichen communities in<br />
their area. However, this process depends on the availability of national instruments that justify local conservation<br />
measures. National Red lists are the most frequently used instruments to define threat categories and<br />
conservation priorities. Establishing national Red Lists is a very demanding scientific task and its complexity is<br />
often underestimated by scientists and funding agencies. However, Red Lists are often the most solid scientific<br />
basis available on which conservation measures can be based upon.<br />
(1A – O2) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0129-00001<br />
LUNGWORT’S PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE IS A STEEPLECHASE IN THE FOREST:<br />
SMALL SCALE GENETIC PATTERN OF LOBARIA PULMONARIA IN A PRIMEVAL<br />
BEECH FOREST LANDSCAPE<br />
Nadyeina O. V. 1 , Dymytrova L. V. 1 , Naumovych G. O. 2 , Postoyalkin S. V. 2 , Scheidegger C. 3<br />
1 Lichenology & Bryology, M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />
2 Botany, Kherson State University, Kherson, Ukraine<br />
3 Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Institute for forest, Snow and Landscape Research,<br />
Birmensdorf, Switzerland<br />
Lobaria pulmonaria is a widespread, but regionally threatened epiphytic lichen species with special<br />
habitat requirements to old-growth and primeval forests. The species is suffering a strong decline in managed<br />
forest landscapes in most areas of Europe and North America. Our study aimed at investigating epiphytic lichen<br />
species diversity and population genetics of L. pulmonaria in one of Europe’s largest primeval beech (Fagus sylvatica)<br />
forests, situated in the Ukrainian Carpathians, the Uholka-Shyrokoluzhanskyi branch of the Carpathian<br />
Biosphere Reserve. Mountain slopes of this massif are covered by almost pure beech forests with varying altitudes<br />
from 400 to 1,500 m. occupying an area of 15,974 ha, almost 9,000 ha from which are considered to be<br />
virgin forests (Brändli & Dowhanytsch 2003). During 2009-2011 we have visited 339 plots and collected about<br />
1,500 specimens from about 500 trees. Trees with L. pulmonaria were found in floodplain forests along the small<br />
streams (400-700 m alt.) and in relatively open forests on the mountain ridges close to the timberline (900-1,200<br />
m alt.). Lobaria pulmonaria samples were genetically investigated with symbiont-specific microsatellite markers<br />
for myco- and phycobiont. A Bayesian analysis of the genetic population structure revealed two distinct clusters,<br />
which were distributed over the entire study area. One cluster was confined to floodplain forests and the second<br />
cluster was concentrated along the mountain ridges. On the mountain ridges, but not in the floodplain forests we<br />
found several admixed demes and a few individuals with an intermediate genotype. Intermediate genotype can<br />
be interpreted as F1 hybrid between the two different genetic clusters.<br />
7<br />
1A-O