09.01.2013 Views

Message - 7th IAL Symposium

Message - 7th IAL Symposium

Message - 7th IAL Symposium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The 7 th International Association for Lichenology <strong>Symposium</strong> 2012<br />

(2I-O8) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0277-00001<br />

GOOD-BYE MORPHOLOGY, OR THREE CHEERS FOR NUANCE? MOLECULAR<br />

PHYLOGENETICS AND A POSTERIORI MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS<br />

IN TWO CRUSTOSE LICHEN GENERA<br />

Spribille T. 1 , Grube M. 2<br />

1 Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States<br />

2 Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria<br />

Recent advances in molecular phylogenetic analyses of lichen mycobionts have revealed that many<br />

taxa traditionally assumed to represent single, widespread species in fact consist of multiple, genetically distinct<br />

lineages. Consistent with a current popular trend across biological disciplines, these have been interpreted by<br />

many authors as “cryptic species”. While some authors have highlighted the usefulness of molecular markers for<br />

elucidating relationships in morphologically subtle groups, others suggest that the morphological approach itself<br />

is problematic and leading lichenologists potentially to overlook large nodes of diversity. Detection of diagnostic<br />

signal in a morphological character set requires systematic testing of congruence of a wide range of traits with<br />

identified clades. In molecular studies of mycobionts in two morphology-poor crust lichen genera, Mycoblastus<br />

and Xylographa, we recently detected numerous previously overlooked monophyletic groups that by most<br />

current measures would be called cryptic species. In some cases our results quadruple or quintuple the number<br />

of species relative to classical concepts. We tested the null hypothesis of no congruence between phenotype<br />

and genotype by scoring traditional and non-traditional morphological and chemical traits against the resulting<br />

molecular clades. In both genera, we found nearly all lineages could be reliably recognized using phenotypic<br />

characters alone. Far from being problematic, reliance on morphology underlies nearly all hypothesis-testing in<br />

current lichen molecular phylogenetics from the proposal stage to final publication. Molecular phylogeneticists<br />

have a unique opportunity to support and be supported by field lichenologists in ongoing efforts to elucidate<br />

specific problems such as photobiont effects on morphology and convergent body plan evolution in symbiosis.<br />

Together they can make meaningful contributions to lichen conservation that go well beyond the lab bench.<br />

27<br />

2I-O

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!