Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The 7 th International Association for Lichenology <strong>Symposium</strong> 2012<br />
(2I-O8) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0277-00001<br />
GOOD-BYE MORPHOLOGY, OR THREE CHEERS FOR NUANCE? MOLECULAR<br />
PHYLOGENETICS AND A POSTERIORI MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS<br />
IN TWO CRUSTOSE LICHEN GENERA<br />
Spribille T. 1 , Grube M. 2<br />
1 Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States<br />
2 Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria<br />
Recent advances in molecular phylogenetic analyses of lichen mycobionts have revealed that many<br />
taxa traditionally assumed to represent single, widespread species in fact consist of multiple, genetically distinct<br />
lineages. Consistent with a current popular trend across biological disciplines, these have been interpreted by<br />
many authors as “cryptic species”. While some authors have highlighted the usefulness of molecular markers for<br />
elucidating relationships in morphologically subtle groups, others suggest that the morphological approach itself<br />
is problematic and leading lichenologists potentially to overlook large nodes of diversity. Detection of diagnostic<br />
signal in a morphological character set requires systematic testing of congruence of a wide range of traits with<br />
identified clades. In molecular studies of mycobionts in two morphology-poor crust lichen genera, Mycoblastus<br />
and Xylographa, we recently detected numerous previously overlooked monophyletic groups that by most<br />
current measures would be called cryptic species. In some cases our results quadruple or quintuple the number<br />
of species relative to classical concepts. We tested the null hypothesis of no congruence between phenotype<br />
and genotype by scoring traditional and non-traditional morphological and chemical traits against the resulting<br />
molecular clades. In both genera, we found nearly all lineages could be reliably recognized using phenotypic<br />
characters alone. Far from being problematic, reliance on morphology underlies nearly all hypothesis-testing in<br />
current lichen molecular phylogenetics from the proposal stage to final publication. Molecular phylogeneticists<br />
have a unique opportunity to support and be supported by field lichenologists in ongoing efforts to elucidate<br />
specific problems such as photobiont effects on morphology and convergent body plan evolution in symbiosis.<br />
Together they can make meaningful contributions to lichen conservation that go well beyond the lab bench.<br />
27<br />
2I-O