Message - 7th IAL Symposium

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lichen: from genome to ecosystem in a changing world 3A-P (3A-P18) Submission ID: IAL0201-00002 DIVERSITY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE GENUS LOBARIELLA (LOBARIACEAE) Moncada Cardenas B. 1 , Betancourt L. 1 , Lücking R. 2 1 Licenciatura en Biologia, Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas, Bogota, Distrito Capital, Colombia 2 Department of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, United States The lichen genus Lobariella is characterized within the family Lobariaceae by a white-tomentose underside lacking cyphellae, pseudocyphellae, and veins, but instead having pseudocyphellae on the upper surface, resembling those of Parmelia. For some time, the genus was considered to include five species: Lobariella botryoides (Yoshim. & Arv.) Moncada & Lücking, L. crenulata (Hook. in Kunth) Yoshim. (type species), L. exornata (Zahlbr.) Yoshim., L. pallida (Hook. f.) Moncada & Lücking, and L. subexornata (Yoshim.) Yoshim. The latter four species have a green photobiont, whereas L. botryoides has cyanobacterial photobiont. In the frame of a survey of Lobariaceae in Colombia and adjacent areas, we came across three further, undescribed species of this genus: L. sipmanii Moncada, Betancourt & Lücking, with cyanobacterial photobiont and otherwise morphologically intermediate between L. crenulata and L. pallida; L. soredians Moncada, Betancourt & Lücking spec. nova., similar to L. botryoides but with marginal soredia rather than laminal isidia becoming sorediate, and L. flavomedullosa Moncada, Betancourt & Lücking spec. nova, close to L. crenulata but with pale yellow medulla. A molecular phylogeny based on nuclear ITS confirms the validity of these species and also suggests that Lobariella should be retained at the generic level, along with further division of Lobaria s.lat. into three to four additional genera. Lobariella is an exclusively neotropical genus and found at mid to high elevations in rain and cloud forest as well as paramo. Lobariella botryoides, L. pallida, L. sipmanii, and L. soredians are more characteristic of upper montane cloud forest and paramo vegetation, whereas the other four species, all with green photobiont, are more typically found in montane rain and cloud forest. Each of the eight recognized species is illustrated and a key to all species is presented. 160
The 7 th International Association for Lichenology Symposium 2012 (3A-P19) Submission ID: IAL0201-00004 TYPE AND NOMENCLATURAL STUDIES IN NEOTROPICAL SPECIES OF THE GENUS STICTA (LOBARIACEAE) Moncada Cardenas B. 1 , Lücking R. 2 1 Licenciatura en Biologia, Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas, Bogota, Distrito Capital, Colombia 2 Department of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, United States Sticta is one of the largest, yet least studied macrolichen genera. The available treatments focus on extratropical regions including North America, southern South America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. No modern revision exists for the Neotropics and most of the type material on which names for neotropical material are based has not yet been studied. This applies in particular to names described by Nylander and others based on material collected in Colombia and adjacent areas mainly by Lindig, but also by other historic collectors. As part of a revision of the genus Sticta in Colombia, we present results from type studies of neotropical taxa, with some unexpected conclusions. Among the most intriguing cases are the names Sticta laciniata (Sw.) Ach. and S. laciniata var. dilatata Nyl., comprising common green morphotypes. The first was considered illegitimate, as its basionym, Lichen laciniatus Sw., is a later homonym of L. laciniatus Huds. Therefore, a separate species, S. laciniosa D. J. Galloway., was described for this taxon. However, under ICBN Art. 58.1, Sticta laciniata is to be considered a replacement name for Lichen laciniatus and is legitimate, cited correctly as S. laciniata Ach. Sticta laciniata var. dilatata is cited in Zahlbruckner’s Catalogus as basionym of both S. boliviana Nyl. and S. granatensis Nyl., interpreting the citation of the name S. laciniata var. dilatata in two different publications by Nylander in 1861 and 1863 as as referring to two different taxa. However, in 1863, Nylander referred to the name established in 1861, for which in 1874 he introduced, cryptically, the new name S. boliviana. This name is legitimate, even if it includes the type of S. laciniata var. dilatata and there was no need to establish a replacement name at the species level, because priority does not apply to names at different ranks. Therefore, S. dilatata (Nyl.) Vain. [raising S. laciniata var. dilatata to species rank], is to be considered a homotypic synonym of S. boliviana. Sticta granatensis, on the other hand, and contrary to Zahlbruckner’s interpretation, is not based on S. laciniata var. dilata, but was established separately with a different type. 161 3A-P
Page 1 and 2:
The 7 th IAL Symposium 2012 Lichens
Page 3 and 4:
The 7 th International Association
Page 5 and 6:
Welcome Message The 7 th Internatio
Page 7 and 8:
Welcome Message Dear IAL7 Participa
Page 9 and 10:
Report The 7 th International Assoc
Page 11 and 12:
Opening Address The 7 th Internatio
Page 13 and 14:
IAL COUNCIL (2008-2012): The 7 th I
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
SYMPOSIUM VENUE The 7 th Internatio
Page 19 and 20:
FLOOR PLAN The 7 th International A
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Scientific Program P14
Page 37 and 38:
s s The 7 th International Associat
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
s s s s s s The 7 th International
Page 43 and 44:
s s The 7 th International Associat
Page 45 and 46:
s s s s s The 7 th International As
Page 47 and 48:
s s s The 7 th International Associ
Page 49 and 50:
s s s s The 7 th International Asso
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
s s s s s s s The 7 th Internationa
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67:
ABSTRACTS OF CONTRIBUTED PAPERS (OR
Page 70 and 71:
1 2 3
Page 72 and 73:
Lichen: from genome to ecosystem in
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
1A-O Lichen: from genome to ecosyst
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
1B-O Lichen: from genome to ecosyst
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
2A-1-O Lichen: from genome to ecosy
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
3B-1-O Lichen: from genome to ecosy
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
2A-1-P Lichen: from genome to ecosy
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181: 2A-2-P Lichen: from genome to ecosy
Page 182 and 183: 2A-2-P Lichen: from genome to ecosy
Page 184 and 185: Lichen: from genome to ecosystem in
Page 236 and 237: 3B-1-P Lichen: from genome to ecosy
Page 276: 1 2 3
show all

Message - 7th IAL Symposium

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?