09.01.2013 Views

Message - 7th IAL Symposium

Message - 7th IAL Symposium

Message - 7th IAL Symposium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The 7 th International Association for Lichenology <strong>Symposium</strong> 2012<br />

(2I-O5) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0098-00001<br />

RECONSTRUCTION OF ANCESTRAL STATES USING PHYLOGENIES:<br />

PARMELIACEAE AS A CASE STUDY<br />

Kauff F. 1 , Divakar P.K. 2 , Lumbsch H. T. 3 , Crespo A. 2<br />

1 Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany<br />

2 Departamento de Biología Vegetal II, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain<br />

3 Department of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, United States<br />

Parmelioid lichens are a diverse and ubiquitous group of foliose lichens. Molecular phylogenetic studies<br />

have confirmed or rejected the monophyly of various genera – some newer, some older - , and others, previously<br />

believed to be unrelated, fell within single monophyletic groups. Reliable phylogenies for the parmelioid<br />

lichens enable us to further address the question of character evolution in this challenging group of lichens. Our<br />

recent study of 762 specimens using maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses of combined datasets of up<br />

to four loci served as a starting point for a reconstruction of ancestral states for several nodes of interest. Maximum<br />

Likelihood and Bayesian Methods with the MESQUITE and BayesCharacters software packages were<br />

used, implementing and comparing binary and multistate character coding together with one- or multi-parameter<br />

models. All major monophyletic clades and subclades within the parmelioid lichens were analyzed for various<br />

sets of morphological and chemical chracters, e.g. growth form, habitat, epicortex, and others. For example,<br />

for the parmelioid lichens a non-pored epicortex with pseudocyphellae and the presence of usnic acid could be<br />

reconstructed, whereas growth form and habitat remain controversial depending on the methods used for reconstruction.<br />

For most of the investigated clades, results supported with statistical significance were not conflicting<br />

between Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood methods, or between binary and multistate character coding.<br />

However, the level of statistical support varied considerably for many reconstructions. Given the considerable<br />

size and complexity of our data set, our results suggest that in such cases, a given method for reconstruction of<br />

ancestral states may be inconclusive, and results should generally be compared with other methods or models<br />

in order to achieve reliable conclusions.<br />

(2I-O6) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0096-00003<br />

MORPHOLOGICAL DISPARITY AND SPECIES DELIMITATION OF LICHEN IN THE GENUS<br />

CLADIA (LECANORALES, ASCOMYCOTA)<br />

Parnmen S. 1 , Rungsiruji A. 2 , Mongkolsuk P. 3 , Boonpragob K. 3 , Lumbsch H.T. 1<br />

1 Department of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois, United States<br />

2 Biology, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand<br />

3 Biology, Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok, Thailand<br />

Phylogenetic studies of the genera Cladia, Heterodea and Ramalinora as well as the Cladia aggregata<br />

complex were carried out using the ribosomal nuclear ITS and LSU, mitochondrial SSU, protein-coding Mcm7<br />

and protein-coding GAPDH DNA sequences. Bayesian, Maximum likelihood (ML) and Maximum parsimony<br />

(MP) methods together with General Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC) were employed. Based on different analyses,<br />

the foliose genus Heterodea and the crustose genus Ramalinora were nested within the fruticose genus<br />

Cladia. For the C. aggregata complex, analyses based on a combined data set of nuITS and protein-coding<br />

GAPDH under GMYC criteria revealed at least eleven distinct lineages. Almost all previously recognized species<br />

were intermixed within this complex. Causes of the disparity exhibited unusual morphological in this group are<br />

discussed.<br />

25<br />

2I-O

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!