Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Message - 7th IAL Symposium
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The 7 th International Association for Lichenology <strong>Symposium</strong> 2012<br />
(2B-O5) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0220-00001<br />
USING LICHENS TO EVALUATE TASMANIAN FORESTS<br />
Kantvilas G. 1 , Jarman J. 1<br />
1 Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, Tasmanian Herbarium, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia<br />
Lichens are a major component of forest biodiversity in Tasmania. However, using them to explore<br />
broader ecological questions such as forest history, structure and composition is very much in its early stages,<br />
unlike in Europe, for example, where the role of lichens as indicators of forest age and continuity is well-established.<br />
In Tasmania, complications arise because the lichens are still incompletely known taxonomically; the<br />
ecology and distribution of many species is likewise incompletely documented; there is a political imperative to<br />
contribute lichen information to the forest management debate, even with incomplete data; and there is only a<br />
limited understanding in the broader community of lichens themselves, their life-history and their habit ecology.<br />
Comparisons of lichens from unlogged and from harvested, regenerating forests is one way that lichens can<br />
contribute to the forestry debate. These comparisons can be undertaken in various ways; for example, using<br />
indices of diversity, comparison of species composition, or comparing abundance of particular taxa. However,<br />
these approaches do not fully take into account that species have individual responses to disturbance, different<br />
habitat requirements and different conservation status. We present a preliminary classification of Tasmanian forest<br />
lichens based on general field observations, targeted study of particular species, targeted study of particular<br />
sites, and herbarium records. This classification offers a tool whereby the ecological quality of forest sites can<br />
be evaluated.<br />
(2B-O6) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0160-00001<br />
ECOLOGICAL FACTORS AND POPULATION DYNAMICS OF LOBARIA PULMONARIA:<br />
IS IT AN ENDANGERED SPECIES IN SPAIN?<br />
Rubio-Salcedo M. 1 , Martínez I. 1 , Merinero S. 1 , Otálora M. G. 1<br />
1 Biology and Geology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Mostoles, Madrid, Spain<br />
The aim of this study is to describe and analyze the key variables affecting Lobaria pulmonaria populations,<br />
considering its ecology and population dynamics. For this purpose we defined environmental, demographic<br />
and physiological variables in two different habitats establishing 4 plots in central Spain: 2 of them in<br />
oak forests (Quercus pyrenaica), and 2 more in beech forests (two 1 ha, two 0.25 ha plots). All trees in each<br />
plot were georeferenced, described and marked. Location, size, status, and presence of sexual and/or asexual<br />
reproductive structures of all L. pulmonaria individuals in each plot were registered. Per plot, 200 individuals<br />
were randomly selected and marked. Semiannually, pictures of those 800 individuals are being taken in order to<br />
estimate potential reproductive changes and/or size variation. Monthly, we are also recording the physiological<br />
variable Fv/Fm of those 800 individuals, as a stress indicator (at noon and at predawn). Besides, 360 sampling<br />
squares (20x20cm) have also been set to find out L. pulmonaria establishment rates. Environmental factors<br />
determining presence, abundance, size and reproductive capability will be analyzed using Generalized Lineal<br />
Models and Generalized Lineal Mixed Models. Currently, 11680 L. pulmonaria individuals have been described.<br />
Trees hosting L. pulmonaria individuals are thicker and have rougher bark. Lobaria pulmonaria shows different<br />
patterns depending on forest type and among plots. One of the plots presents much lower population density<br />
than the other three (100 individuals/ha vs. 9,000 individuals/ha). Phorophytes differences were also found on<br />
height distribution pattern (individuals on beech grow grouped in the lower (