09.01.2013 Views

Message - 7th IAL Symposium

Message - 7th IAL Symposium

Message - 7th IAL Symposium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The 7 th International Association for Lichenology <strong>Symposium</strong> 2012<br />

(2B-O5) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0220-00001<br />

USING LICHENS TO EVALUATE TASMANIAN FORESTS<br />

Kantvilas G. 1 , Jarman J. 1<br />

1 Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, Tasmanian Herbarium, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia<br />

Lichens are a major component of forest biodiversity in Tasmania. However, using them to explore<br />

broader ecological questions such as forest history, structure and composition is very much in its early stages,<br />

unlike in Europe, for example, where the role of lichens as indicators of forest age and continuity is well-established.<br />

In Tasmania, complications arise because the lichens are still incompletely known taxonomically; the<br />

ecology and distribution of many species is likewise incompletely documented; there is a political imperative to<br />

contribute lichen information to the forest management debate, even with incomplete data; and there is only a<br />

limited understanding in the broader community of lichens themselves, their life-history and their habit ecology.<br />

Comparisons of lichens from unlogged and from harvested, regenerating forests is one way that lichens can<br />

contribute to the forestry debate. These comparisons can be undertaken in various ways; for example, using<br />

indices of diversity, comparison of species composition, or comparing abundance of particular taxa. However,<br />

these approaches do not fully take into account that species have individual responses to disturbance, different<br />

habitat requirements and different conservation status. We present a preliminary classification of Tasmanian forest<br />

lichens based on general field observations, targeted study of particular species, targeted study of particular<br />

sites, and herbarium records. This classification offers a tool whereby the ecological quality of forest sites can<br />

be evaluated.<br />

(2B-O6) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0160-00001<br />

ECOLOGICAL FACTORS AND POPULATION DYNAMICS OF LOBARIA PULMONARIA:<br />

IS IT AN ENDANGERED SPECIES IN SPAIN?<br />

Rubio-Salcedo M. 1 , Martínez I. 1 , Merinero S. 1 , Otálora M. G. 1<br />

1 Biology and Geology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Mostoles, Madrid, Spain<br />

The aim of this study is to describe and analyze the key variables affecting Lobaria pulmonaria populations,<br />

considering its ecology and population dynamics. For this purpose we defined environmental, demographic<br />

and physiological variables in two different habitats establishing 4 plots in central Spain: 2 of them in<br />

oak forests (Quercus pyrenaica), and 2 more in beech forests (two 1 ha, two 0.25 ha plots). All trees in each<br />

plot were georeferenced, described and marked. Location, size, status, and presence of sexual and/or asexual<br />

reproductive structures of all L. pulmonaria individuals in each plot were registered. Per plot, 200 individuals<br />

were randomly selected and marked. Semiannually, pictures of those 800 individuals are being taken in order to<br />

estimate potential reproductive changes and/or size variation. Monthly, we are also recording the physiological<br />

variable Fv/Fm of those 800 individuals, as a stress indicator (at noon and at predawn). Besides, 360 sampling<br />

squares (20x20cm) have also been set to find out L. pulmonaria establishment rates. Environmental factors<br />

determining presence, abundance, size and reproductive capability will be analyzed using Generalized Lineal<br />

Models and Generalized Lineal Mixed Models. Currently, 11680 L. pulmonaria individuals have been described.<br />

Trees hosting L. pulmonaria individuals are thicker and have rougher bark. Lobaria pulmonaria shows different<br />

patterns depending on forest type and among plots. One of the plots presents much lower population density<br />

than the other three (100 individuals/ha vs. 9,000 individuals/ha). Phorophytes differences were also found on<br />

height distribution pattern (individuals on beech grow grouped in the lower (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!