Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Message - 7th IAL Symposium
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The 7 th International Association for Lichenology <strong>Symposium</strong> 2012<br />
(3I – P9) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0249-00001<br />
AMYLOLYTIC ACTIVITIES OF SOME THERMOPHILIC MYCOBIONTS ISOLATED IN NIGERIA<br />
Ogunleye A. O. 1<br />
1 Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Lead City University, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria<br />
A total of 16 species of fungi were isolated from 3 locations viz:-two refuse-dump sites and palm kernel<br />
stack in Ibadan, Nigeria. Out of the 16 isolates obtained at 45 ° C incubation temperature, 9 were found to be<br />
thermotolerant while the other 7 were found to be thermophilic. The thermophilic and thermotolerant fungi were<br />
separated from the others by incubating at a low temperature of 12 °C at which the thermotolerant fungi grew,<br />
while the thermophilic did not grow at this temperature. All the fungi (thermophilic and thermotolerant) were<br />
screened for possible antimicrobial activities using different media sources. However, none of the screened<br />
organisms showed sign of antimicrobial activity by having no clear zone of inhibition against the test organisms.<br />
The test organisms used were Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus. The conditions necessary for the<br />
production of extracellular amylase enzyme of thermophilic fungi isolated were determined using a stationary<br />
liquid medium of starch-yeast extract. Amylases were produced by all the thermophilic fungi. The amylase activities<br />
of all the fungi used were determined at pH 6.9. The peak activities for the enzyme (amylase) were shown<br />
to be at 45 ° C. The possible use of extracellular enzymes from these fungi for various purposes is discussed.<br />
(3I – P10) Submission ID: <strong>IAL</strong>0266-00001<br />
PHYCOBIONTS IN SUSPENSION: METHODS OF QUANTIFICATION<br />
Catala M. 1 , Dominguez N. 1 , Moreno H. 1 , Barreno E. 2<br />
1 Biology and Geology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Mostoles, Spain<br />
2 Inst. Cavanilles of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Botany Dept., Faculty of Biology,<br />
University of Valencia, Burjassot, Spain<br />
The quantification of phycobiont concentration in suspensions is usually performed under the microscope<br />
by means of hemocytometric chambers. This method is time consuming and the presence of phycobiont<br />
clusters increases experimental error. Future advances in phycobiont biology require rapid and precise surrogate<br />
methods. Optical density (OD) has long been used in microbiology since it is simple and rapid. Chlorophyll<br />
autofluorescence can be used as a measure of cell number, a widespread method in green algae research.<br />
Finally, the use of specific stoichiometric fluorescent probes, such as Hoechst, allows precise quantification of<br />
DNA. Fluorometric methods are extremely sensitive and very low concentrations can be detected. Furthermore,<br />
the use of microplates and plate-readers can greatly assist in this task, since tens of low volume samples can<br />
be measured simultaneously. The aim of this work is the study of different surrogate methods for the quantification<br />
of phycobiont suspensions. Two axenic strains, Asterochloris erici Ahmadjian (SAG 32.85 = UTEX 911),<br />
and Trebouxia sp.(TR9) isolated from Ramalina farinacea, were studied. Suspensions were grown in 3NBBM<br />
(16:8 h light:dark) at 20ºC and 15ºC, respectively. A Fuchs-Rosenthal hemocytometric chamber was used for<br />
cell counts. OD (650 nm) was measured in fresh 100 µl-aliquots with an Anthos 2010 plate-reader. Chlorophyll<br />
autofluorescence (λexc 485 nm, λem 635 nm) and DNA-bound Hoechst fluorescence (λexc 360, λem 465 nm)<br />
were measured in a TECAN SPECTRAFluor Plus plate-reader. Frozen 200 µl aliquots were used for fluorometric<br />
methods. Chlorophyll samples were thawed and directly measured, DNA samples were previously lysed in a<br />
DNA buffer. The results show that OD gives reproducible, rapid results, using low volumes. However, its sensitivity<br />
is the lowest. Chlorophyll autofluorescence is rapid and sensitive but requires the availability of a fluorometer,<br />
as DNA quantification, that also needs a short sample processing. However, both OD and chlorophyll autofluorescence<br />
may be affected by changes during phycobiont cell cycle (i.e. debris, cluster/cell size, metabolism). We<br />
conclude that the measurements studied may be used as surrogates of cell number but the limitations of each<br />
method must always be considered. [MCINN (CGL2009-13429-C02-01/02), AECID (PCI_A_l024755/09) and<br />
Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO 174/2008 GVA)]<br />
137<br />
3I-P