24.01.2013 Views

DRS2012 Bangkok Proceedings Vol 4 - Design Research Society

DRS2012 Bangkok Proceedings Vol 4 - Design Research Society

DRS2012 Bangkok Proceedings Vol 4 - Design Research Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Andreas UNTEIDIG, Florian SAMETINGER, Jennifer SCHUBERT,<br />

Veronika AUMANN and Max SCHÄTH, Gesche JOOST<br />

the variation phase is merely the start of the process – or to think that our work is<br />

powerful enough to also cover the subsequent phases that Jonas calls “selection” and<br />

“re-stabilization”, according to the evolutionary process:<br />

“Although design activities desperately attempt to cover / include the selection- and restabilization<br />

phases in their considerations, they are necessarily de-coupled from these<br />

phases”. (Jonas 2006:4)<br />

While we argue that we can set up the design infrastructure in a way that will most likely<br />

withstand the selection process, we are aware of the even more pressing fact that we will<br />

leave the research setting at a given point in the future – and this often is the moment<br />

where a project ends definitively.<br />

In order to cope with these challenges, we were looking for a solution that answers all of<br />

the three questions:<br />

� How can we ensure the creation of real authorship in the inhabitants, as experts<br />

of their daily life/reality?<br />

� How can we involve the largest possible number of actors?<br />

� How can we ensure the sustainability of the project itself, or in other words, how<br />

can we ensure that the project and its results will remain after designers and<br />

researchers leave the community?<br />

We argue that the “ambassador approach” provides us with a holistic solution by<br />

gradually shifting authorship and responsibility from the designers to the actors.<br />

By analyzing the existing structures of social engagement in our local research setting<br />

and its close surroundings, we are currently identifying, activating and interconnecting<br />

players that already have a high level of involvement in the neighborhood.<br />

The designed infrastructure amplifies their work, as well as providing a strong framework<br />

for collaboration, through a series of workshops, tools and organized sharing of ideas.<br />

We argue that by doing so we enable the community to consider different perspectives<br />

and expertise while also ensuring a high level of productivity.<br />

With this transformation of active stakeholders into “Neighborhood Lab Ambassadors” we<br />

plan on creating a self-sustaining infrastructure that carries out the resulting activities of<br />

the project with decreasing necessity for the involvement of designer and researcher. In<br />

addition, we expect the ambassadors to be much more successful in reaching and<br />

involving their fellow citizens in order to turn passivity into action, mainly because they<br />

have lived in this very community for a long time and enjoy an outstanding social status<br />

due to their prior roles as actors.<br />

“Ambassadors Workshop”<br />

As an intermediate milestone we conducted an “ambassadors workshop” which took<br />

place at Kreativhaus in mid-November. Through word-of-mouth, posters and numerous<br />

conversations we were able to mobilize around 25 participants of a broad range of ages,<br />

educations and personal backgrounds.<br />

Through the workshop we managed to gather and interconnect a larger group of<br />

motivated and interested citizens who had not been in conversation before. This<br />

gathering sparked clearly observable dynamics that led to the “open founding” of our firstgeneration<br />

ambassador group.<br />

Conference <strong>Proceedings</strong> 1685

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!