24.01.2013 Views

DRS2012 Bangkok Proceedings Vol 4 - Design Research Society

DRS2012 Bangkok Proceedings Vol 4 - Design Research Society

DRS2012 Bangkok Proceedings Vol 4 - Design Research Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1762 Conference <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Adisorn SUPAWATANAKUL and Anne SCHORR<br />

information that can be beneficial to others, many organizations do not<br />

have an effective mechanism to facilitate sharing such information. In<br />

addition, the vision from upper management is crucial to achieving the<br />

departmental buy-in necessary for inter-departmental collaboration.<br />

For example, our client in the public transportation industry is comprised of<br />

three separate agencies: commuter rail service, metropolitan rail and bus<br />

services, and suburban bus service. Competing for ridership, the three<br />

systems are designed to keep their riders on their service as long as<br />

possible. Our research revealed that the three systems poorly support the<br />

connecting services that many riders need. Riders were left to negotiate<br />

the connections between the three systems on their own: some developed<br />

elaborate workarounds to optimize their ride, some struggled to use the<br />

system, and others abandoned the system altogether. Improving the rider<br />

experience would require changing the interaction between these three<br />

agencies, addressing work processes and strategies at an organizational<br />

level.<br />

2.4 Understanding the customer’s perspective requires a<br />

different type of research<br />

Differing client and customer perspectives can lead to very different<br />

expectations for design research. While the client’s departments each<br />

focus narrowly on a specific part of the customer experience, customers<br />

view the experience broadly, as a continuous whole. The result of such<br />

differing viewpoints is that clients may be blindsided by customer<br />

frustrations.<br />

For example, in a shopping study, we found one customer frustrated that<br />

she was unable to return a product she purchased at Target.com to the<br />

local Target store. In her mind, it was the same company, so the<br />

experience should be seamless. In reality, Target and Target.com were<br />

operated independently with little intersection besides the brand.<br />

Another example is from our client in the entertainment industry. In this<br />

company, each department has its own area of interest. Each department<br />

funds design research projects independently, focusing on their specific<br />

area. So while the marketing team may fund a focus group to identify<br />

opportunities around advertising, the interaction design team may conduct<br />

research on how customers navigate music choices, and the business<br />

development team may look into partnership opportunities, and so on.<br />

However from the customer’s point of view, each department is<br />

responsible for one step in his or her overall experience of learning about,<br />

selecting, and listening to new music.<br />

When framing the research from the user’s point of view, the research<br />

team discovers how the customer perceives the stages of the experience,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!