24.01.2013 Views

DRS2012 Bangkok Proceedings Vol 4 - Design Research Society

DRS2012 Bangkok Proceedings Vol 4 - Design Research Society

DRS2012 Bangkok Proceedings Vol 4 - Design Research Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6. Conclusions<br />

Anna SERAVALLI<br />

This article has developed two contributions: the first is the understanding of collaborative,<br />

open and democratic innovation as processes of social shaping; the second is the<br />

understanding of how to design in and for social shaping.<br />

Social shaping is used to describe processes of co-creation, underlining the complexity<br />

and challenges of participatory practices where, in a specific local framework, a designing<br />

network is developed by involving stakeholders with diverse agendas. To explore how to<br />

design for and in a process of social shaping, the case of Fabriken is presented. In<br />

particular, the article describes the shift from a design-in-the-studio to a design-in-use<br />

strategy, which creates the possibility of having participatory explorations during the use<br />

phase through the tactics of prototyping, small-scale interventions and long-term<br />

engagement.<br />

Based on Fabriken’s experiences, social shaping seems promising for the generation of<br />

manifold grass-root innovation, and design-in-use appears to be successful in supporting<br />

these processes.<br />

However, further research is needed to investigate the role of the designer in social<br />

shaping and to define more precisely the competences needed in the shift from a funnel<br />

process, where designers have a leading role, to a design-in-use process, where<br />

leadership is distributed between participants, conflicting agendas are navigated and local<br />

framework is considered.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Thanks to Pelle Ehn, Elisabet M. Nillsson, Richard Topgaard, Caroline Lundholm and<br />

STPLN people, Fabriken Team, 1scale1, Luisa and Tantverket, Cykelköket,<br />

Forskningavdelningen and all the people participating in the social shaping of Fabriken.<br />

Additional thanks to the participants of the Summer School “Social Shaping of Innovation”<br />

at SPIRE Center, Denmark.<br />

References<br />

Bauwens, M. (2006). The Political Economy of Peer Production. Post-autistic economics review, 37( 3), 33-44.<br />

Binder, T. Redström J. (2006). Programs, Experiments and Exemplary <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Research</strong>. DRS Wonderground Conference 2006.<br />

Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., Hillgren, P.-A. (2010). Participatory design and “democratizing innovation”. In <strong>Proceedings</strong> of the 11th<br />

Conference on Participatory <strong>Design</strong>, PDC 2010.Sydney, AU<br />

Buur, J., Day, D., Laarsen, H.,Mack, A.(2011). Social Shaping of Innovation. Summerschool. SPIRE Centre. Sönderborg, DK.<br />

Buur, J., Laarsen, H. (2010). Quality of conversations in participatory innovation. Co-design, 6(3), 121-138,<br />

Bødker, S., (1991). Through the Interface – a Human Activity Approach to User Interface <strong>Design</strong>. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum<br />

Associates.<br />

Conference <strong>Proceedings</strong> 1707

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!