Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
tel-00559107, version 1 - 24 Jan 2011<br />
4.2 Simulation<br />
With a <strong>high</strong> value of λ, θ oscillates as well. In order to give some resilience to θ<br />
in this case, λ should be not be set too <strong>high</strong>. A value between 1 <strong>and</strong> 10 seems to<br />
be sufficient.<br />
− ∆T : (in the adaptation function of the observer (4.5)). The smaller∆ T , the<br />
shorter the rising time of θ. We take∆ T =0.1. This is sufficiently small that the<br />
equation F0(θ) remains compatible with the ODE solver 9 .<br />
As explained at the end of the previous subsection (i.e. Subsection 4.2.2), innovation<br />
is considered as a discrete function of time. Therefore we need to set the sampling time<br />
of this process. We denote it δ. It depends on the measurement hardware <strong>and</strong> is<br />
not a critical parameter. Nevertheless, it seems intuitive that d<br />
δ must be sufficiently<br />
d<br />
<strong>high</strong> to at least reflect the rank of the observability of the system, i.e. δ ≥ n − 1.<br />
Indeed, innovation is used as a direct measurement of distinguishability. A theoretical<br />
justification of this remark is provided in Section 5.2 of Chapter 5 where an adaptive<br />
continuous-discrete version of our observer is provided.<br />
Parameters d <strong>and</strong> m2 are closely related to the application, but in a very clear manner.<br />
When d is too small, innovation is not sufficiently large to distinguish between an<br />
increase in the estimation error <strong>and</strong> the influence of noise. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, a value<br />
for the innovation that is too <strong>high</strong> increases the computation time as the prediction is<br />
made on a larger time interval. The value of d has to be chosen using our knowledge of<br />
the time constant of the system (simulations or data samples), i.e., some fraction (e.g.<br />
) of the smallest time constant appears to be a reasonable choice.<br />
1<br />
3<br />
to 1<br />
5<br />
Remark 45<br />
When the system encounters a <strong>high</strong> perturbation at time t, one would expect a delay<br />
of length d in the adaptation of θ. However, the inequality of Lemma 33 is valid for<br />
any delay 0