Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tel-00559107, version 1 - 24 Jan 2011<br />
− from the definition of r, D>0,<br />
− (a − 2b<br />
x0 ) is an increasing function of x0, so is A,<br />
B.1 Bounds on the Riccati Equation<br />
− B can be rewritten (a − 2b<br />
x0 )2 � (4b 2 +2ar) 2 − 4r 2 a 2� , the right part is positive, <strong>and</strong><br />
the left one is an increasing function of x0, so is B.<br />
X µ (x0) is therefore an increasing function of x0, so is µψ(x0) (i.e. P (X) was obtained<br />
from the change of variables X = e 2bτ ).<br />
Remark 85<br />
1. Notice that since ψ(0) = x0, therefore for all τ ∈ [0,µψ(x0)], ψ(τ) ≤ ψ(0) = x0.<br />
2. Let x∗ 0 > 0 be fixed, <strong>and</strong> denote ψx∗(τ) the associated ψ function. It is a decreasing<br />
0<br />
function over [0,µψ(x∗ 0 )]. The fact that µψ(x∗ 0 ) is an increasing function of x0 tells us<br />
that for any x0 >x∗ 0 , ψx0 (τ) is a decreasing function of τ over the interval [0,µψ(x∗ 0 )] ⊂<br />
[0,µψ(x0)].<br />
In other words ψx0 (µψ(x∗ 0 )) 0 be fixed. There<br />
exist two scalars β2 > 0 <strong>and</strong> µ>0 such that<br />
Sk(+) ≤ β2Id,<br />
for all T ∗ ≤ τk, k ∈ N, for all subdivision {τi}i∈N, τi − τi−1 0 be arbitrarily fixed. We define B(T ∗ )= 2b<br />
a<br />
+ 2b<br />
a<br />
1<br />
e 2bT ∗ −1 + rT ∗ . From Lemma<br />
82, x(T ∗ ) ≤ B(T ∗ ) independently from the subdivision {τi}i∈N.<br />
Let us define µ as the maximum value such that the functions φ(τ), <strong>and</strong> ψ B(T ∗ )(τ) of Lemma<br />
84 are both decreasing functions over the interval [0,µ]. Notice that µ depends on B(T ∗ ).<br />
We claim that β2 = B(T ∗ )+rµ solves the problem.<br />
Let us consider a time subdivision {τi}i∈N such that τi − τi−1 ≤ µ, for all i ∈ N.<br />
We show first that if xk(+) ≤ β2, then xk+1(+) ≤ β2.<br />
1. If xk(+) ≤ 2b<br />
a then, from Lemma 80, xk+1(−) ≤ max � 2b<br />
a ,xk(+) � = 2b<br />
a . Therefore<br />
xk+1(+) ≤ 2b<br />
a + rµ ≤ β2,<br />
2. if xk(+) ≥ 2b<br />
a , <strong>and</strong> xk(+) ≤ B(T ∗ ), we use Lemma 80 a<strong>gain</strong> to deduce xk+1(−) ≤<br />
max � 2b<br />
a ,xk(+) � ≤ B(T ∗ ). Finally we have xk+1(+) ≤ B(T ∗ )+rµ = β2,<br />
141