28.01.2013 Views

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00559107, version 1 - 24 Jan 2011<br />

− from the definition of r, D>0,<br />

− (a − 2b<br />

x0 ) is an increasing function of x0, so is A,<br />

B.1 Bounds on the Riccati Equation<br />

− B can be rewritten (a − 2b<br />

x0 )2 � (4b 2 +2ar) 2 − 4r 2 a 2� , the right part is positive, <strong>and</strong><br />

the left one is an increasing function of x0, so is B.<br />

X µ (x0) is therefore an increasing function of x0, so is µψ(x0) (i.e. P (X) was obtained<br />

from the change of variables X = e 2bτ ).<br />

Remark 85<br />

1. Notice that since ψ(0) = x0, therefore for all τ ∈ [0,µψ(x0)], ψ(τ) ≤ ψ(0) = x0.<br />

2. Let x∗ 0 > 0 be fixed, <strong>and</strong> denote ψx∗(τ) the associated ψ function. It is a decreasing<br />

0<br />

function over [0,µψ(x∗ 0 )]. The fact that µψ(x∗ 0 ) is an increasing function of x0 tells us<br />

that for any x0 >x∗ 0 , ψx0 (τ) is a decreasing function of τ over the interval [0,µψ(x∗ 0 )] ⊂<br />

[0,µψ(x0)].<br />

In other words ψx0 (µψ(x∗ 0 )) 0 be fixed. There<br />

exist two scalars β2 > 0 <strong>and</strong> µ>0 such that<br />

Sk(+) ≤ β2Id,<br />

for all T ∗ ≤ τk, k ∈ N, for all subdivision {τi}i∈N, τi − τi−1 0 be arbitrarily fixed. We define B(T ∗ )= 2b<br />

a<br />

+ 2b<br />

a<br />

1<br />

e 2bT ∗ −1 + rT ∗ . From Lemma<br />

82, x(T ∗ ) ≤ B(T ∗ ) independently from the subdivision {τi}i∈N.<br />

Let us define µ as the maximum value such that the functions φ(τ), <strong>and</strong> ψ B(T ∗ )(τ) of Lemma<br />

84 are both decreasing functions over the interval [0,µ]. Notice that µ depends on B(T ∗ ).<br />

We claim that β2 = B(T ∗ )+rµ solves the problem.<br />

Let us consider a time subdivision {τi}i∈N such that τi − τi−1 ≤ µ, for all i ∈ N.<br />

We show first that if xk(+) ≤ β2, then xk+1(+) ≤ β2.<br />

1. If xk(+) ≤ 2b<br />

a then, from Lemma 80, xk+1(−) ≤ max � 2b<br />

a ,xk(+) � = 2b<br />

a . Therefore<br />

xk+1(+) ≤ 2b<br />

a + rµ ≤ β2,<br />

2. if xk(+) ≥ 2b<br />

a , <strong>and</strong> xk(+) ≤ B(T ∗ ), we use Lemma 80 a<strong>gain</strong> to deduce xk+1(−) ≤<br />

max � 2b<br />

a ,xk(+) � ≤ B(T ∗ ). Finally we have xk+1(+) ≤ B(T ∗ )+rµ = β2,<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!