28.01.2013 Views

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tel-00559107, version 1 - 24 Jan 2011<br />

For any k, we compute Sk(+) iteratively:<br />

B.1 Bounds on the Riccati Equation<br />

Sk(+) = e−λτkφu(τk, 0)S0φ ′<br />

� u(τk, 0)<br />

τk<br />

+λ e<br />

0<br />

−λ(τk−v)<br />

�<br />

φu(τk,v) S(v) − S(v)QS(v)<br />

�<br />

φ<br />

λ<br />

′<br />

u(τk,v)dv<br />

k�<br />

+<br />

i=1<br />

e −λ(τk−τi) φu(τk, τi)C ′<br />

R −1 Cφ ′<br />

u(τk, τi)(τi − τi−1) .<br />

(B.13)<br />

We consider this last equation for any k ∈ N ∗ such that τk ≥ T∗. It is of the form<br />

Sk(+) = (I)+(II)+(III), in the same order as before.<br />

− Since S0 is positive definite, (I) is positive definite,<br />

�<br />

�<br />

− from the definition of λ,<br />

is positive definite, <strong>and</strong> the same goes for<br />

(II),<br />

S(v) − S(v)QS(v)<br />

λ<br />

− let us define l < k as the maximal element of N such that τk − τl ≥ T∗. Since we<br />

consider (B.13) for times τk ≥ T∗ such an element always exists 5 . Note that because<br />

the subdivisions we use have a step less than µ, τk − τl ≤ T∗ + µ. All the terms of the<br />

sum (III) are symmetric definite positive matrices <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

(III) ≥<br />

k�<br />

i=l+1<br />

e −λ(τk−τi) φu(τk, τi)C ′<br />

R −1 Cφ ′<br />

u(τk, τi)(τi − τi−1) .<br />

From the properties of the resolvent, the right h<strong>and</strong> side expression can be rewritten,<br />

with ū(τ) =u(τ + τl):<br />

k�<br />

i=l+1<br />

e −λ(τk−τi) φū(τk − τl, τi − τl)C ′<br />

R −1 Cφ ′<br />

ū(τk − τl, τi − τl)(τi − τi−1) . (B.14)<br />

For all i = {l +1, .., k} we have e −λ(τk−τi) ≥ e −λ(T∗+µ) , <strong>and</strong> R −1 is a fixed symmetric<br />

positive definite matrix. Therefore in order to lower bound (B.14) we have to find a<br />

lower bound for<br />

k�<br />

i=l+1<br />

φū(τk − τl, τi − τl)C ′<br />

Cφ ′<br />

ū(τk − τl, τi − τl)(τi − τi−1) . (B.15)<br />

Note that this sum is now computed for a subdivision of the interval [0, τk − τl] that<br />

has the very specific property T∗ ≤ τk − τl ≤ T∗ + µ. Let us redefine this subdivision as<br />

follows:<br />

– let k∗ be equal to k − l, the subdivision has k∗ + 1 elements,<br />

– we denote ˜τi = τi+l − τl –i.e. ˜τ0 = 0 <strong>and</strong> ˜τk∗ = τk − τl.<br />

5 It can happen that k = 0. Recall that τ0 = 0 for all subdivisions.<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!