28.01.2013 Views

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00559107, version 1 - 24 Jan 2011<br />

B.1 Bounds on the Riccati Equation<br />

where AM = sup<br />

[0;T ∗ �<br />

�<br />

(|A(u(τ)|), �<br />

]<br />

�b ∗ �<br />

�<br />

(z, u) � ≤ Lb <strong>and</strong> s = AM + Lb.<br />

Gronwall’s lemma gives<br />

|S(τ)| ≤| Sk−1(+)|e 2s(τ−τk−1)<br />

. (B.3)<br />

Therefore, with c = |C ′<br />

RC|,<br />

|Sk(+)| ≤| Sk−1(+)|e 2s(τk−τk−1) + c (τk − τk−1) . (B.4)<br />

Consider a subdivision {τk}k∈N such that τ0 = 0. From equation (B.4):<br />

|S1(+)| ≤| S0|e 2sτ1 + cτ1.<br />

Since we set θ(0) = 1 then ¯ S0 = S0 <strong>and</strong> there is no ambiguity in the notation. We iterate to<br />

obtain<br />

|S2(+)| ≤| S0|e 2sτ2 + cτ1e 2s(τ2−τ1) + c(τ2 − τ1),<br />

<strong>and</strong> for all k ∈ N<br />

|Sk(+)| ≤| S0|e2sτk �i=k<br />

+ c (τi − τi−1) e 2s(τk−τi)<br />

i=1<br />

≤ |S0|e2sτk + ce2sτk �i=k<br />

i=1<br />

(τi − τi−1) e −2sτi .<br />

Since e−2sτ is a decreasing function of τ, the sum on the right h<strong>and</strong> side of the inequality is<br />

smaller than the integral of e−2sτ over the interval [0, τk]. Therefore<br />

|Sk(+)| ≤| S0|e2sτk + ce2sτk � τk<br />

e<br />

0<br />

−2sτ dτ<br />

≤ |S0|e2sτk + c<br />

�<br />

2sτk<br />

2s e − 1 � .<br />

From this last equation we conclude that for any subdivision <strong>and</strong> any k ∈ N such that τk ≤ T ∗ :<br />

�<br />

|Sk(+)| ≤ |S0| + c<br />

�<br />

2sT ∗<br />

e = β1.<br />

2s<br />

In order to prove the result for times greater than T ∗ , consider a symmetric semi positive<br />

matrix S. We have S ≤ |S|Id = � Tr(S 2 )Id, <strong>and</strong> according to fact 2.(b): S ≤ Tr(S)Id.<br />

Therefore, investigations on the upper bound are done in the form of investigations on the<br />

trace of S.<br />

Lemma 79<br />

If S : [0,T[→ Sn is a solution to dS<br />

dτ<br />

where:<br />

= −A′ S − SA − SQS then for almost all τ ∈ [0,T[,<br />

d<br />

dτ Tr(S) ≤−a (Tr (S(τ))) 2 +2bTr (S(τ)) ,<br />

a = λmin(Q)<br />

n<br />

b = sup τ Tr(A ′<br />

(τ)A(τ)) 1<br />

2 .<br />

134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!