28.01.2013 Views

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00559107, version 1 - 24 Jan 2011<br />

(a) if A ≥ B ≥ 0, <strong>and</strong> U is orthogonal, then U ′<br />

AU ≥ U ′<br />

BU,<br />

B.1 Bounds on the Riccati Equation<br />

(b) A, <strong>and</strong> B as in (a), <strong>and</strong> A is invertible, then ρ(BA −1 ) ≤ 1, where ρ denotes the<br />

spectral radius,<br />

(c) A, <strong>and</strong> B as in (a), then λi(A) ≥ λi(B), where λi(M) denote the i th eigenvalue of<br />

the matrix M sorted in ascending order,<br />

(d) A, <strong>and</strong> B as in (a), <strong>and</strong> both invertible then B −1 ≥ A −1 ≥ 0,<br />

(e) A, <strong>and</strong> B as in (a), then det(A) ≥ det(B), <strong>and</strong> Tr(A) ≥ Tr(B),<br />

(f) if A1 ≥ B1 ≥ 0, <strong>and</strong> if A2 ≥ B2 ≥ 0 then A1 + A2 ≥ B1 + B2 ≥ 0.<br />

4. From facts 1.(c) <strong>and</strong> 3.(f) we deduce that:<br />

B.1.1 Part One: the Upper Bound<br />

(A ≥ B ≥ 0) ⇒ (|A| ≥| B| ≥ 0) .<br />

This first part of the proof is decomposed into three steps. Let T ∗ be a fixed, positive scalar.<br />

1. We prove that there is β1 such that for all τk ≤ T ∗ , k ∈ N, Sk(+) ≤ β1Id,<br />

2. we show that there exists β2 such that for all T ∗ ≤ τk, k ∈ N, Sk(+) ≤ β2Id,<br />

3. we deduce the result for all times.<br />

The first fact can be directly proven as follows.<br />

Lemma 78<br />

Consider equation (B.1) <strong>and</strong> the assumptions of Lemma 77. Let T ∗ > 0 be fixed. There<br />

exists β1 > 0 such that<br />

Sk(+) ≤ β1Id,<br />

for all τk ≤ T ∗ , k ∈ N, independently from the subdivision {τi}i∈N.<br />

Proof.<br />

For all τ ∈ [τk−1; τk], equation (B.1) gives:<br />

� τ dS (v)<br />

S (τ) = Sk−1(+) +<br />

dτ dv,<br />

= Sk−1(+)<br />

� τ<br />

+<br />

τk−1<br />

τk−1<br />

⎡<br />

⎣−<br />

�<br />

A(u)+ � b ∗ (z, u)<br />

θ<br />

�′<br />

S − S<br />

Since SQS is symmetric definite positive, we can write<br />

⎡<br />

� �<br />

τ<br />

S (τ) ≤ Sk−1(+) + ⎣− A(u)+ �b ∗ �′<br />

(z, u)<br />

S − S<br />

θ<br />

<strong>and</strong> fact 4 gives us<br />

τk−1<br />

� τ<br />

|S(τ)| ≤| Sk−1(+)| +<br />

133<br />

τk−1<br />

�<br />

A(u)+ � b ∗ (z, u)<br />

θ<br />

�<br />

�<br />

A(u)+ � b ∗ (z, u)<br />

θ<br />

⎤<br />

− SQS⎦<br />

dv.<br />

� ⎤<br />

⎦ dv,<br />

2s|S|dv, (B.2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!