Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tel-00559107, version 1 - 24 Jan 2011<br />
(a) if A ≥ B ≥ 0, <strong>and</strong> U is orthogonal, then U ′<br />
AU ≥ U ′<br />
BU,<br />
B.1 Bounds on the Riccati Equation<br />
(b) A, <strong>and</strong> B as in (a), <strong>and</strong> A is invertible, then ρ(BA −1 ) ≤ 1, where ρ denotes the<br />
spectral radius,<br />
(c) A, <strong>and</strong> B as in (a), then λi(A) ≥ λi(B), where λi(M) denote the i th eigenvalue of<br />
the matrix M sorted in ascending order,<br />
(d) A, <strong>and</strong> B as in (a), <strong>and</strong> both invertible then B −1 ≥ A −1 ≥ 0,<br />
(e) A, <strong>and</strong> B as in (a), then det(A) ≥ det(B), <strong>and</strong> Tr(A) ≥ Tr(B),<br />
(f) if A1 ≥ B1 ≥ 0, <strong>and</strong> if A2 ≥ B2 ≥ 0 then A1 + A2 ≥ B1 + B2 ≥ 0.<br />
4. From facts 1.(c) <strong>and</strong> 3.(f) we deduce that:<br />
B.1.1 Part One: the Upper Bound<br />
(A ≥ B ≥ 0) ⇒ (|A| ≥| B| ≥ 0) .<br />
This first part of the proof is decomposed into three steps. Let T ∗ be a fixed, positive scalar.<br />
1. We prove that there is β1 such that for all τk ≤ T ∗ , k ∈ N, Sk(+) ≤ β1Id,<br />
2. we show that there exists β2 such that for all T ∗ ≤ τk, k ∈ N, Sk(+) ≤ β2Id,<br />
3. we deduce the result for all times.<br />
The first fact can be directly proven as follows.<br />
Lemma 78<br />
Consider equation (B.1) <strong>and</strong> the assumptions of Lemma 77. Let T ∗ > 0 be fixed. There<br />
exists β1 > 0 such that<br />
Sk(+) ≤ β1Id,<br />
for all τk ≤ T ∗ , k ∈ N, independently from the subdivision {τi}i∈N.<br />
Proof.<br />
For all τ ∈ [τk−1; τk], equation (B.1) gives:<br />
� τ dS (v)<br />
S (τ) = Sk−1(+) +<br />
dτ dv,<br />
= Sk−1(+)<br />
� τ<br />
+<br />
τk−1<br />
τk−1<br />
⎡<br />
⎣−<br />
�<br />
A(u)+ � b ∗ (z, u)<br />
θ<br />
�′<br />
S − S<br />
Since SQS is symmetric definite positive, we can write<br />
⎡<br />
� �<br />
τ<br />
S (τ) ≤ Sk−1(+) + ⎣− A(u)+ �b ∗ �′<br />
(z, u)<br />
S − S<br />
θ<br />
<strong>and</strong> fact 4 gives us<br />
τk−1<br />
� τ<br />
|S(τ)| ≤| Sk−1(+)| +<br />
133<br />
τk−1<br />
�<br />
A(u)+ � b ∗ (z, u)<br />
θ<br />
�<br />
�<br />
A(u)+ � b ∗ (z, u)<br />
θ<br />
⎤<br />
− SQS⎦<br />
dv.<br />
� ⎤<br />
⎦ dv,<br />
2s|S|dv, (B.2)