Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tel-00559107, version 1 - 24 Jan 2011<br />
2.6 On Adaptive High-<strong>gain</strong> Observers<br />
− consider the adaptation function:<br />
�<br />
γ|y(t) − z1(t)|<br />
˙s =<br />
2 for |y(t) − z1(t)| > λ<br />
0 for |y(t) − z1(t)| ≤ λ.<br />
The parameter θ is adapted according to the rule:<br />
− when t =0set θ =1<br />
− when s(t) =θi, set θ = θi (or in other words θ = sup{θi ≤ s(t)}).<br />
(2.12)<br />
It is clear from the definition of the adaptation procedure that the parameter θ cannot<br />
decrease which makes this observer a solution to a tuning problem rather than the noise<br />
reduction problem. The convergence of the observer is established in the following theorem.<br />
This observer comes from a paper published in 1997 (i.e. [35]), we therefore checked<br />
for updates of the strategy in more recent paper. In [36], the authors address λ-tracking<br />
problems 15 . The observer they use is the one described in this section.<br />
Theorem 18 ([35])<br />
Consider the system (2.10) above, together with the assumptions<br />
1. the system exhibits no finite escape time, <strong>and</strong><br />
2. the nonlinearity φ(x, u) is bounded.<br />
Then for any λ > 0, γ > 0, β > 0 <strong>and</strong> any S0:<br />
the total length of time for which the observer output error is larger than λ is finite.<br />
That is to say:<br />
�<br />
∃Tmax < ∞ : dt < Tmax where T = {t|�y(t) − z1(t)� ≥λ}.<br />
T<br />
In another theorem of the same paper (i.e. Theorem 3 of [35]), an upper bound for the<br />
estimation error for <strong>high</strong> values of t is provided. But in the original article from which this<br />
observer is inspired, [111], the estimation error is not bounded by an exponentially decreasing<br />
function of the time.<br />
The main differences between these works <strong>and</strong> with the work proposed here is that firstly<br />
that our observer is a <strong>Kalman</strong> based observer which, implies taking into account the evolution<br />
of the Riccati matrix. The second distinction is that here we address the problem of noise<br />
reduction when the estimation is sufficiently good.<br />
2.6.2 L. Praly, P. Krishnamurthy <strong>and</strong> coworkers<br />
The second observer with a dynamically sized <strong>high</strong>-<strong>gain</strong> parameter proposed that we will<br />
expose in this review is one from L. Praly, K. Krishnamurthy <strong>and</strong> coworkers. Descriptions of<br />
15 As explained in the article, λ-tracking is used for processes for which we know for certain that asymptotic<br />
stabilization can be achieved only by approximation. The objective is therefore modified into one of stabilizing<br />
the state within a sphere of radius λ centered on the set point.<br />
24