28.01.2013 Views

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

Adaptative high-gain extended Kalman filter and applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00559107, version 1 - 24 Jan 2011<br />

2.6 On Adaptive High-<strong>gain</strong> Observers<br />

− consider the adaptation function:<br />

�<br />

γ|y(t) − z1(t)|<br />

˙s =<br />

2 for |y(t) − z1(t)| > λ<br />

0 for |y(t) − z1(t)| ≤ λ.<br />

The parameter θ is adapted according to the rule:<br />

− when t =0set θ =1<br />

− when s(t) =θi, set θ = θi (or in other words θ = sup{θi ≤ s(t)}).<br />

(2.12)<br />

It is clear from the definition of the adaptation procedure that the parameter θ cannot<br />

decrease which makes this observer a solution to a tuning problem rather than the noise<br />

reduction problem. The convergence of the observer is established in the following theorem.<br />

This observer comes from a paper published in 1997 (i.e. [35]), we therefore checked<br />

for updates of the strategy in more recent paper. In [36], the authors address λ-tracking<br />

problems 15 . The observer they use is the one described in this section.<br />

Theorem 18 ([35])<br />

Consider the system (2.10) above, together with the assumptions<br />

1. the system exhibits no finite escape time, <strong>and</strong><br />

2. the nonlinearity φ(x, u) is bounded.<br />

Then for any λ > 0, γ > 0, β > 0 <strong>and</strong> any S0:<br />

the total length of time for which the observer output error is larger than λ is finite.<br />

That is to say:<br />

�<br />

∃Tmax < ∞ : dt < Tmax where T = {t|�y(t) − z1(t)� ≥λ}.<br />

T<br />

In another theorem of the same paper (i.e. Theorem 3 of [35]), an upper bound for the<br />

estimation error for <strong>high</strong> values of t is provided. But in the original article from which this<br />

observer is inspired, [111], the estimation error is not bounded by an exponentially decreasing<br />

function of the time.<br />

The main differences between these works <strong>and</strong> with the work proposed here is that firstly<br />

that our observer is a <strong>Kalman</strong> based observer which, implies taking into account the evolution<br />

of the Riccati matrix. The second distinction is that here we address the problem of noise<br />

reduction when the estimation is sufficiently good.<br />

2.6.2 L. Praly, P. Krishnamurthy <strong>and</strong> coworkers<br />

The second observer with a dynamically sized <strong>high</strong>-<strong>gain</strong> parameter proposed that we will<br />

expose in this review is one from L. Praly, K. Krishnamurthy <strong>and</strong> coworkers. Descriptions of<br />

15 As explained in the article, λ-tracking is used for processes for which we know for certain that asymptotic<br />

stabilization can be achieved only by approximation. The objective is therefore modified into one of stabilizing<br />

the state within a sphere of radius λ centered on the set point.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!