13.02.2013 Views

Download the entire proceedings as an Adobe PDF - Eastern Snow ...

Download the entire proceedings as an Adobe PDF - Eastern Snow ...

Download the entire proceedings as an Adobe PDF - Eastern Snow ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

h<strong>as</strong> begun to generate GIS GeoTiff compatible output at <strong>the</strong> 4km resolution. This product will be<br />

archived <strong>an</strong>d disseminated at <strong>the</strong> NSIDC. The GeoTiff archive will sp<strong>an</strong> from February 2004 until<br />

<strong>the</strong> latest <strong>an</strong>alysis day when complete.<br />

<strong>Snow</strong> <strong>an</strong>d ice extent <strong>an</strong>d coverage h<strong>as</strong> been <strong>the</strong> primary output for <strong>the</strong> IMS. However, this is far<br />

from <strong>the</strong> lone variable needed for modeling snow <strong>an</strong>d ice behavior at regional <strong>an</strong>d global scales.<br />

NOAA/NESDIS is at <strong>the</strong> cusp of introducing new snow products that work in conjunction with <strong>the</strong><br />

IMS to improve initialization in atmospheric models. A common problem reported with IMS h<strong>as</strong><br />

been continuing to keep snow cover during cloud obscured periods. The IMS <strong>an</strong>alysts apply m<strong>an</strong>y<br />

tools <strong>an</strong>d images to produce a “best guess” approach to snow observing. However, IMS <strong>an</strong>alysts<br />

leave conditions <strong>as</strong> <strong>the</strong>y were since <strong>the</strong> l<strong>as</strong>t observation when clouds obscure visible observations,<br />

snow is too thin for microwave detection, <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong>re are no station reports. This c<strong>an</strong> be problematic<br />

when snow h<strong>as</strong> actually melted away. Atmospheric models contain algorithms to estimate snow<br />

depth throughout day <strong>an</strong>d predict ablation of snow cover. However, snow ablation in atmospheric<br />

models is reinitialized with <strong>the</strong> current snow extent from IMS. If <strong>the</strong> snow in <strong>the</strong> IMS is merely<br />

<strong>the</strong> result of continu<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d not observed, this reinitialization c<strong>an</strong> lead to false snow observations<br />

<strong>an</strong>d propagate errors throughout <strong>the</strong> NCEP model. A file of l<strong>as</strong>t observation time for <strong>the</strong> IMS h<strong>as</strong><br />

been developed <strong>an</strong>d is undergoing testing. This will allow modelers to choose to use IMS for snow<br />

cover observation or to b<strong>as</strong>e snow cover on modeled estimates. <strong>Snow</strong> water equivalent (SWE) h<strong>as</strong><br />

been produced by SSM/I me<strong>as</strong>urements for m<strong>an</strong>y decades, <strong>an</strong>d is a valuable snow variable for<br />

atmospheric <strong>an</strong>d hydrologic modelers. NOAA NESDIS is currently testing a combined AMSU<br />

<strong>an</strong>d IMS SWE product that will merge <strong>the</strong> reliable IMS snow cover observations with AMSU’s<br />

capacity for estimating SWE (Kongoli et al., 2006). An example of <strong>the</strong> pre-merged <strong>an</strong>d merged<br />

products is demonstrated in Figure 5. Additional snow variables like snow depth <strong>an</strong>d fractional<br />

snow covered area are being experimented with to improve model initialization in combination<br />

with IMS output (Rom<strong>an</strong>ov et al., 2003). Future NOAA efforts for sea <strong>an</strong>d lake ice variables<br />

utilizing IMS ice cover such <strong>as</strong> ice concentration <strong>an</strong>d ice thickness are in <strong>the</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ning stage.<br />

The enh<strong>an</strong>cements of input <strong>an</strong>d output are not <strong>the</strong> only short-term ch<strong>an</strong>ges pl<strong>an</strong>ned for <strong>the</strong><br />

product’s future. Current pl<strong>an</strong>s are to relocate <strong>the</strong> operational production of <strong>the</strong> IMS from its<br />

current location of SAB to <strong>the</strong> NIC. This tr<strong>an</strong>sition from one agency within NESDIS to <strong>an</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r is<br />

being done with <strong>the</strong> hope of producing <strong>an</strong> improved product at a reduced cost for NESDIS <strong>as</strong> a<br />

whole. This should lead to less duplication in sea ice monitoring within NESDIS by parallel<br />

offices, consolidate network systems <strong>an</strong>d imagery storage, free SAB personnel time for o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

products, <strong>an</strong>d allow time for NIC personnel trained for IMS <strong>an</strong>alysis to meet NCEP requirements<br />

of two IMS observations per day. All NIC personnel will undergo <strong>the</strong> same training <strong>as</strong> SAB<br />

personnel <strong>an</strong>d meet IMS qualifications before being <strong>as</strong>signed to IMS product generation. Parallel<br />

product generation will be performed at <strong>the</strong> SAB <strong>an</strong>d NIC until comparable output products are<br />

obtained between offices. After evaluation <strong>an</strong>d duplication of <strong>the</strong> IMS h<strong>as</strong> been achieved,<br />

production of <strong>the</strong> IMS will tr<strong>an</strong>sition fully to <strong>the</strong> NIC. No production methods o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>n<br />

personnel will ch<strong>an</strong>ge during this process.<br />

Longer-term pl<strong>an</strong>s for enh<strong>an</strong>cements to <strong>the</strong> IMS input data revolve around <strong>the</strong> future<br />

deployment of NPOESS <strong>an</strong>d GOES-R. NPOESS will be a joint military <strong>an</strong>d civili<strong>an</strong> satellite<br />

replacing m<strong>an</strong>y of <strong>the</strong> existing U.S. polar orbiting sensors with improved sensors such <strong>as</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Visible Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite (VIIRS), Conical Sc<strong>an</strong>ning Microwave Imager/Sounder<br />

(CMIS), <strong>an</strong>d Adv<strong>an</strong>ced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS).<br />

GOES-R will be <strong>the</strong> next generation of NOAA geostationary satellites that will aide snow <strong>an</strong>d<br />

ice observations. Geostationary satellites are regarded by <strong>an</strong>alysts <strong>as</strong> <strong>the</strong> most valuable input<br />

source. IMS <strong>an</strong>alysts <strong>as</strong>sessing surface cryospheric coverage will benefit greatly by <strong>the</strong><br />

adv<strong>an</strong>cements in remote sensing provided on GOES-R, particularly <strong>the</strong> Adv<strong>an</strong>ced B<strong>as</strong>eline Imager<br />

(ABI). The ABI will have 16 spectral b<strong>an</strong>ds, compared with five on <strong>the</strong> current GOES imagers.<br />

The ABI will improve <strong>the</strong> spatial coverage from 1km to 0.5km at nadir for broadb<strong>an</strong>d visible <strong>an</strong>d<br />

from 4km to 2km for <strong>the</strong> infrared b<strong>an</strong>ds. For snow <strong>an</strong>d ice detection this will improve <strong>the</strong> ability<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>an</strong>alyst to confirm <strong>the</strong> presence of ice on <strong>the</strong> surface through recognition of spatial patterns<br />

more discernable at higher resolutions, such <strong>as</strong> dendritic spatial patterns of snow on mountains, ice<br />

floe shapes that indicate certain ice thickness, or ice fractures. The ABI also includes spectral<br />

176

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!