13.02.2013 Views

Download the entire proceedings as an Adobe PDF - Eastern Snow ...

Download the entire proceedings as an Adobe PDF - Eastern Snow ...

Download the entire proceedings as an Adobe PDF - Eastern Snow ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

subsequent lower microwave brightness temperatures when me<strong>as</strong>ured above <strong>the</strong> surface (Goita et<br />

al., 1997). Wet <strong>an</strong>d/or dense snow packs however, decre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>the</strong> amount of scattering, <strong>an</strong>d produce<br />

near blackbody emissions (Sokol et al., 1999). Complex snow packs, containing numerous layers<br />

at different densities, selectively influence microwave radiation, producing inconsistent<br />

me<strong>as</strong>urements.<br />

Radiation recorded by a microwave sensor is expressed <strong>as</strong> a brightness temperature (TB) in<br />

Kelvin units. One parameter commonly derived from remotely sensed brightness temperatures is<br />

snow water equivalent (SWE), which is <strong>the</strong> amount of water stored in a snow pack that is available<br />

upon melt.<br />

Intensive research with p<strong>as</strong>sive microwave TB data h<strong>as</strong> focused on empirically derived<br />

algorithms used to estimate SWE for validation of ground-truth observations (Goodison <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Walker, 1994; Goita et al., 1997; Derksen et al., 2002; 2003a). Currently, <strong>the</strong> Meteorological<br />

Service of C<strong>an</strong>ada (MSC) employs a suite of linear algorithms to retrieve SWE estimates from<br />

p<strong>as</strong>sive microwave sensors. The MSC algorithms vary according to l<strong>an</strong>d cover, with different<br />

coefficients used for open prairie, deciduous forest, coniferous forest, <strong>an</strong>d sparse forest (Goita et<br />

al., 1997; Singh <strong>an</strong>d G<strong>an</strong>, 2000; Derksen et al, 2003a; 2003b). For example, <strong>the</strong> algorithm used to<br />

derive SWE over <strong>the</strong> open prairie is a vertically polarized TB gradient ratio (Goodison <strong>an</strong>d Walker,<br />

1994) defined <strong>as</strong>:<br />

SWE (mm) = –20.7 – (37v – 19v) * 2.59 (1)<br />

Variables 37v <strong>an</strong>d 19v are <strong>the</strong> brightness temperatures acquired from vertically polarized<br />

frequencies of 37 <strong>an</strong>d 19 GHz, while <strong>the</strong> coefficients 2.59 <strong>an</strong>d –20.7 are <strong>the</strong> slope <strong>an</strong>d intercept of<br />

<strong>the</strong> best-fit regression line found between ground <strong>an</strong>d airborne brightness temperatures (Goodison,<br />

1989). Numerous studies have found SWE estimates derived from this algorithm to be within<br />

±10–20 mm of in-situ observations (Goodison <strong>an</strong>d Walker, 1994; Derksen et al., 2002; 2003b),<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> MSC algorithm <strong>as</strong>sumes a complete snow cover <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> effects of patchy snow cover<br />

on SWE estimates are not well understood.<br />

To help underst<strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> relationship between patchy snow covers <strong>an</strong>d remotely sensed SWE<br />

estimates, a field campaign to me<strong>as</strong>ure SWE in a highly variable snow pack w<strong>as</strong> conducted from<br />

February 21 st to 23 rd , 2005 in sou<strong>the</strong>rn S<strong>as</strong>katchew<strong>an</strong>. The objectives of this study were to:<br />

i) Compare remotely sensed SWE estimates against ground-truth me<strong>as</strong>urements;<br />

ii) Determine how well <strong>the</strong> MSC prairie SWE algorithm performs over a patchy snow cover;<br />

<strong>an</strong>d<br />

iii) Identify in-situ variables that signific<strong>an</strong>tly influence p<strong>as</strong>sive microwave SWE estimates<br />

over a patchy snow cover.<br />

STUDY AREA<br />

The study area is located approximately 100 km south of Regina, S<strong>as</strong>katchew<strong>an</strong> around <strong>the</strong><br />

town of Radville <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> villages of P<strong>an</strong>gm<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Ceylon (Figure 1). This area w<strong>as</strong> selected<br />

because previous research had been performed in this area by Environment C<strong>an</strong>ada. In addition,<br />

<strong>the</strong> snow cover typical of this area h<strong>as</strong> been found to have regions of both patchy <strong>an</strong>d complete<br />

snow-cover (Goodison <strong>an</strong>d Walker, 1994; Turchenek, 2004).<br />

The Missouri Coteau, a remn<strong>an</strong>t glacial moraine, cuts across <strong>the</strong> southwest portion of <strong>the</strong> study<br />

area, forming a low, rolling topography. Although <strong>the</strong> natural vegetation in this area consists of<br />

short gr<strong>as</strong>ses, a large portion of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>an</strong>d is under agricultural production, where wheat <strong>an</strong>d o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

grains are farmed. Pockets of trees <strong>an</strong>d shrubs create shelter belts in are<strong>as</strong> with higher moisture<br />

supply.<br />

Relatively short warm summers <strong>an</strong>d long cold winters are characteristic of S<strong>as</strong>katchew<strong>an</strong>’s<br />

prairies (Hare <strong>an</strong>d Thom<strong>as</strong>, 1979). With few perennial streams, much of <strong>the</strong> region’s water supply<br />

298

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!