Plan Binacional para la Recuperación de la Tortuga Lora ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

National Marine Fisheries Service. 2004a. Endangered Species Act-Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion on the pound net fishery in Virginia waters of the Chesapeake Bay. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2004b. A requirements plan for improving the understanding of the status of U.S. protected marine species. Report of the NOAA Fisheries Service National Task Force for improving marine mammal and turtle stock assessments.U.S. Dep. Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-63, 112p. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2005a. Endangered Species Act-Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion on Amendment 1 to the Gulf of Mexico Regional Biological Opinion on hopper dredging. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2005b. Endangered Species Act-Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion on the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station in New Jersey. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2007a. Report to Congress on the Impacts of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma on Alabama, Louisiana, Florida, Mississippi, and Texas Fisheries. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, Maryland. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2007b. Endangered Species Act-Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion on the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Gas Activities: Five-Year Leasing Plan for the Western and Central Planning Areas 2007-2012. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2009a. Estimated takes of sea turtles in the bottom longline portion of the Gulf of Mexico reef fish fishery July 2006 through December 2008 based on observer data. NMFS Southeast Fisheries Science Center Contribution PRD-08/09-07, March 2009. National Marine Fisheries Service.2009b. Estimated takes of loggerhead sea turtles in the vertical line component of the Gulf of Mexico reef fish fishery July 2006 through December 2008 based on observer data and logbook data. NMFS Southeast Fisheries Science Center Contribution PRD-08/09-09, May, 2009. Available at http://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/seaturtleunpublishedreports.jsp National Marine Fisheries Service. 2009c. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for sea turtle conservation and recovery in relation to the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico trawl fisheries and to conduct public scoping meetings. Federal Register 74(88):21627-21631. May 8, 2009. National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. Kemp’s ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys kempii): 5-year review summary and evaluation. Document available through: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/listing/reviews.htm#species V-22
National Marine Protected Areas Center (NMPAC). 2006. Revised draft framework for developing the National System of Marine Protected Areas. Document available through: http://mpa.gov/national_system/framework_sup.html National Research Council. 1990. Decline of the sea turtles: causes and prevention. National Academy Press, Washington D.C. National Research Council. 1994. Improving the management of U.S. marine fisheries. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. National Research Council. 2002. Effects of trawling & dredging on seafloor habitat. National Academy Press, Washington D.C. National Science Foundation (NSF). 2007. Notice of availability of a draft environmental assessment for proposed activities in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean. Federal Register 72(108):31351-31353. June 6, 2007. North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries. 2007. Assessment of North Carolina commercial finfisheries, 2004-2007. Division of Marine Fisheries, Final Performance Report for Award Number NA 04 NMF4070216. North Carolina Marine Fisheries Commission Sea Turtle Advisory Committee. 2006. Sea turtle interactions with North Carolina fisheries, review and recommendations. North Carolina Marine Fisheries Commission, Morehead City, North Carolina. Available at http://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/seaturtleunpublishedreports.jsp Ogren, L.H. 1989. Distribution of juvenile and subadult Kemp’s ridley turtles: preliminary results form the 1980-1987 surveys. In: Caillouet, C.W. Jr., and Landry, A.M. Jr., (editors), Proceedings of the 1 st Int. Symp. Kemp’s Ridley Sea turtle Biology, Conservation and Management. Texas A & M University Sea Grant College Program Spec. Publ. 89-105:116-123. O’Hara, J. and J.R. Wilcox. 1990. Avoidance responses of loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta, to low frequency sound. Copeia 1990(2):564-567. O’Keefe, D.J. and G.A. Young. 1984. Handbook on the environmental effects of underwater explosions. Naval Surface Weapons Center, Maryland, NSWC TR 83-240. Olsen, K., J. Angel, and F. Petersen. 1983. Observed fish reactions to a surveying vessel wih special reference to herring, cod, capelin and polar cod. Symposium on Fisheries Acoustics. Bergen Norway, June 21, 1982. FAO ISBN 92-5-101450-7 p. 131-138. Oravetz, C.A. and C.J. Grant. 1986. Trawl efficiency device shows promise. Aust. Fish. 1986:37-40. V-23
Page 1 and 2:
Plan Binacional para la Recuperaci
Page 4 and 5:
Página Dejada En Blanco De Manera
Page 6 and 7:
H.2.6. Interacciones entre especies
Page 8 and 9:
EQUIPO DE RECUPERACIÓN Los Servici
Page 10 and 11:
RESUMEN EJECUTIVO ESTADO ACTUAL: La
Page 12 and 13:
Criterios para los factores de enli
Page 14 and 15:
Factor D: Deficiencia en los mecani
Page 16 and 17:
LISTA DE ACRÓNIMOS Y ABREVIATURAS
Page 18 and 19:
PREFACIO La presente revisión del
Page 20 and 21:
(A) Destrucción real o amenaza de
Page 22 and 23:
el apareamiento y tres padres en 14
Page 24 and 25:
Figura 1.- La mayoría de las playa
Page 26 and 27:
Número de nidos 250 200 150 100 50
Page 28 and 29:
E. HISTORIA DE VIDA/ECOLOGÍA La to
Page 30 and 31:
E.3. Zona Oceánica: Etapa juvenil
Page 32 and 33:
Werner, 1994; Witzell y Schmid (200
Page 34 and 35:
tardío, dejando atrás los hábita
Page 36 and 37:
F. DEMOGRAFÍA F.1. Edad y crecimie
Page 38 and 39:
F.3. Tasas de sobrevivencia Con exc
Page 40 and 41:
Para calcular valores reproductivos
Page 42 and 43:
G. LOGROS EN LA CONSERVACIÓN G.1.
Page 44 and 45:
G.2.2.Estados Unidos Durante los ú
Page 46 and 47:
G.3. Protección marina G.3.1. Méx
Page 48 and 49:
plásticos y de establecer normas p
Page 50 and 51:
monitorear los desplazamientos de h
Page 52 and 53:
de este Estado, y en Cayo West y Ho
Page 54 and 55:
2006c; T. Wibbels, UAB, comunicaci
Page 56 and 57:
temperatura de la arena, y sugieren
Page 58 and 59:
(Schroeder 1989). Este organismo in
Page 60 and 61:
Otros patrocinadores que han apoyad
Page 62 and 63:
H.1. Zona terrestre (playas de anid
Page 64 and 65:
lora que salieron a desovar en las
Page 66 and 67:
petróleo sobre la playa, o arrojad
Page 68 and 69:
El Golfo de México es un área de
Page 70 and 71:
depredación. De estos, 73 fueron d
Page 72 and 73:
en desarrollo, aún unos pocos grad
Page 74 and 75:
la educación no sólo hace posible
Page 76 and 77:
ibereñas, éstas también están s
Page 78 and 79:
Las redes de arrastre pelágicas so
Page 80 and 81:
Actualmente en los EE.UU., están a
Page 82 and 83:
comprendiendo varias pesquerías co
Page 84 and 85:
arriba del nivel de marea baja y es
Page 86 and 87:
comerciales de caña y anzuelo, dic
Page 88 and 89:
dragas de arrastre se mueven relati
Page 90 and 91:
evidencia, de que ellas pueden ser
Page 92 and 93:
aptitud biológica o las tasas de m
Page 94 and 95:
Amos, 1988, D. Shaver, PAIS, comuni
Page 96 and 97:
Samuel et al. (2005) midieron los n
Page 98 and 99:
inspección subsiguiente reveló ab
Page 100 and 101:
esultado de 22 experimentos de inve
Page 102 and 103:
conservación; asimismo se deben re
Page 104 and 105:
anidación de México y EE.UU. Este
Page 106 and 107:
1112. Desarrollar e implementar un
Page 108 and 109:
nidos que se encuentran en el estad
Page 110 and 111: Un “área marina protegida” (MP
Page 112 and 113: 214. Desarrollar planes de manejo d
Page 114 and 115: epresentativos, de toda su área de
Page 116 and 117: quizá necesiten utilizar TEDs, dep
Page 118 and 119: exploración adecuada en todas las
Page 120 and 121: de intervención médica mejoraría
Page 122 and 123: al medio natural, pueda exponerlos
Page 124 and 125: EE.UU., (Padre Norte y Sur, y la Pl
Page 126 and 127: ealizarse mediante un memorando de
Page 128 and 129: marinas obtenidas en forma ilegal,
Page 130 and 131: Prioridad 3 Categoría de Acciones
Page 138 and 139: PÁGINA DEJADA EN BLANCO DE MANERA
Page 140 and 141: Baur, G. 1890. The genera of the Ch
Page 142 and 143: (compilers). Proceedings of the Thi
Page 144 and 145: Clark, J.A., J.M. Hoekstra, P.D. Bo
Page 146 and 147: Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2
Page 148 and 149: Camaron del Golfo de Mexico y el Ma
Page 150 and 151: Gracia, A. 1995. Impacto de la pesc
Page 152 and 153: turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) from
Page 154 and 155: Lawler, J.J., S.P. Campbell, A.D. G
Page 156 and 157: Mann, T.M. 1977. Impact of develope
Page 158 and 159: (compilers), Proceedings of the Ele
Page 162 and 163: Orphanides, C.D. and G.M. Magnusson
Page 164 and 165: Farfantepenaeus duorarum (Decapoda:
Page 166 and 167: Schmid, J.R. and W.J. Barichivich.
Page 168 and 169: Shaver, D.J. 2001b. U.S. Geological
Page 170 and 171: Smith, H.M. and R.B. Smith. 1979. S
Page 172 and 173: hatchling sea turtles. Journal of E
Page 174 and 175: orientation of hatchling loggerhead
Page 176 and 177: Alteraciones de Ecosistemas, Contam
Page 178 and 179: edad; sin embargo, las poblaciones
Page 180 and 181: Tabla A1-1. Categorías de Amenaza
Page 182 and 183: Tabla A1-1. Categorías de Amenaza
Page 184 and 185: Tabla A1-3. Clave que se utiliza pa
Page 186 and 187: Tabla A1-5. Mortalidad anual para c
Page 188 and 189: Tabla A1-7 Mortalidad anual para US
Page 190 and 191: Tabla A1-9. La mortalidad anual par
Page 192 and 193: Tabla A1-11. La mortalidad anual pa
Page 194: Tabla A1-13. La mortalidad anual pa
show all

Plan Binacional para la Recuperación de la Tortuga Lora ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?