Plan Binacional para la Recuperación de la Tortuga Lora ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Shaver, D.J. 2001b. U.S. Geological Survey/National Park Service Kemp’s ridley sea turtle research and monitoring programs in Texas. In: M. McKay, J. Nides, W. Lang, and D. Vigil (editors), Proceedings of the Gulf of Mexico Marine Protected Species Workshop. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region. MMS-2001-039.p. 121-124. Shaver, D.J. 2002a. Kemp’s ridley project at Padre Island National Seashore and Texas sea turtle nesting and stranding 2001 report. U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior. Shaver, D.J. 2002b. Research in support of the restoration of sea turtles and their habitat in national seashores and areas along the Texas coast, including the Laguna Madre. Final NRPP Report.U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior. Shaver, D.J. 2004. Kemp’s ridley project at Padre Island National Seashore and Texas sea turtle nesting and stranding 2002 report. National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Shaver, D.J. 2005a. Analysis of the Kemp's ridley imprinting and headstart project at Padre Island National Seashore, Texas, 1978-88, with subsequent nesting and stranding records on the Texas coast. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 4(4):846-859. Shaver, D.J. 2005b. Kemp’s ridley Sea Turtle Project at Padre Island National Seashore and Texas sea turtle nesting and stranding 2003 report. National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Shaver, D.J. 2006a. Kemp’s ridley sea turtle habitat use in Mexico (2003-0212-009). Final Programmatic Report to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Shaver, D.J. 2006b. Kemp’s ridley sea turtle project at Padre Island National Seashore and Texas sea turtle nesting and stranding 2004 report. National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Shaver, D.J. 2006c. Kemp’s ridley sea turtle project at Padre Island National Seashore and Texas sea turtle nesting and stranding 2005 report. National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Shaver, D.J. 2007. Texas sea turtle nesting and stranding 2006 report. National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Shaver, D.J. 2008. Texas sea turtle nesting and stranding 2007 report. National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Shaver, D.J. and C. Rubio. 2008. Post-nesting movement of wild and headstarted Kemp’s V-30
idley sea turtles Lepidochelys kempii in the Gulf of Mexico. Endangered Species Research 4:43-55. Shaver, D.J. and C.W. Caillouet, Jr. 1998. More Kemp’s ridley turtles return to south Texas to nest. Marine Turtle Newsletter 82:1-5. Shaver, D.J. and J.E. Miller. 1999. Kemp’s ridley sea turtles return to Padre Island National Seashore. Park Science 19(2):16-17, 39. Shaver, D.J. and P.T. Plotkin. 1998. Marine debris ingestion by sea turtles in south Texas: pre- and post-MARPOL Annex V. In: R. Byles and Y. Fernandez (compilors), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation. NOAA Technical Memorandum. NMFS-SEFSC-412:124. Shaver, D.J., and T. Wibbels. 2007. Headstarting the Kemp’s ridley sea turtle. In:Plotkin, P.T. (editor), Biology and Conservation of Ridley Sea Turtles. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore. p. 297-323. Shaver, D.J., D.W. Owens, A.H. Chaney, C.W. Caillouet Jr., P.M. Burchfield, and R. Márquez M. 1988. Styrofoam box and beach temperatures in relation to incubation and sex ratios of Kemp's ridley sea turtles. In: B. Schroeder (compiler), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Workshop on Sea Turtle Conservation and Biology. NOAA Technical Memorandum. NMFS-SEFC-214:103-108. Shaver, D.J., A.F. Amos, B. Higgins, and J. Mays. 2005a. Record 42 Kemp’s ridley nests found in Texas in 2004. Marine Turtle Newsletter 108:1-3. Shaver, D.J., B.A. Schroeder, R.A. Byles, P.M. Burchfield, J. Peña, R. Márquez, and H.J. Martinez. 2005b. Movements and home ranges of adult male Kemp’s ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) in the Gulf of Mexico investigated by satellite telemetry. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 4(4):817-827. Shigenaka, G., S. Milton, and P. Lutz. 2003. Oil and sea turtles: biology, planning and response. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS), Office of Response and Restoration. Document available through: http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/book_shelf/36_turtle_intro.pdf Shoop, C.R. and R.D. Kenney. 1992. A new view of sea turtle abundance in northeast U.S. waters. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Workshop on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation.NOAA Technical Memorandum. NMFS-SEFSC-302:108. Skomal, G.B., B.C. Chase, and E.D. Prince. 2002. A comparison of circle hooks and straight hook performance in recreational fisheries for juvenile Atlantic bluefin tuna. In: Lucy, J.A. and A.L. Studholme (editors), Catch and Release Symposium in Marine Recreational Fisheries. American Society Symposium 30, Bethesda, Maryland. p. 57-65. V-31
Page 1 and 2:
Plan Binacional para la Recuperaci
Page 4 and 5:
Página Dejada En Blanco De Manera
Page 6 and 7:
H.2.6. Interacciones entre especies
Page 8 and 9:
EQUIPO DE RECUPERACIÓN Los Servici
Page 10 and 11:
RESUMEN EJECUTIVO ESTADO ACTUAL: La
Page 12 and 13:
Criterios para los factores de enli
Page 14 and 15:
Factor D: Deficiencia en los mecani
Page 16 and 17:
LISTA DE ACRÓNIMOS Y ABREVIATURAS
Page 18 and 19:
PREFACIO La presente revisión del
Page 20 and 21:
(A) Destrucción real o amenaza de
Page 22 and 23:
el apareamiento y tres padres en 14
Page 24 and 25:
Figura 1.- La mayoría de las playa
Page 26 and 27:
Número de nidos 250 200 150 100 50
Page 28 and 29:
E. HISTORIA DE VIDA/ECOLOGÍA La to
Page 30 and 31:
E.3. Zona Oceánica: Etapa juvenil
Page 32 and 33:
Werner, 1994; Witzell y Schmid (200
Page 34 and 35:
tardío, dejando atrás los hábita
Page 36 and 37:
F. DEMOGRAFÍA F.1. Edad y crecimie
Page 38 and 39:
F.3. Tasas de sobrevivencia Con exc
Page 40 and 41:
Para calcular valores reproductivos
Page 42 and 43:
G. LOGROS EN LA CONSERVACIÓN G.1.
Page 44 and 45:
G.2.2.Estados Unidos Durante los ú
Page 46 and 47:
G.3. Protección marina G.3.1. Méx
Page 48 and 49:
plásticos y de establecer normas p
Page 50 and 51:
monitorear los desplazamientos de h
Page 52 and 53:
de este Estado, y en Cayo West y Ho
Page 54 and 55:
2006c; T. Wibbels, UAB, comunicaci
Page 56 and 57:
temperatura de la arena, y sugieren
Page 58 and 59:
(Schroeder 1989). Este organismo in
Page 60 and 61:
Otros patrocinadores que han apoyad
Page 62 and 63:
H.1. Zona terrestre (playas de anid
Page 64 and 65:
lora que salieron a desovar en las
Page 66 and 67:
petróleo sobre la playa, o arrojad
Page 68 and 69:
El Golfo de México es un área de
Page 70 and 71:
depredación. De estos, 73 fueron d
Page 72 and 73:
en desarrollo, aún unos pocos grad
Page 74 and 75:
la educación no sólo hace posible
Page 76 and 77:
ibereñas, éstas también están s
Page 78 and 79:
Las redes de arrastre pelágicas so
Page 80 and 81:
Actualmente en los EE.UU., están a
Page 82 and 83:
comprendiendo varias pesquerías co
Page 84 and 85:
arriba del nivel de marea baja y es
Page 86 and 87:
comerciales de caña y anzuelo, dic
Page 88 and 89:
dragas de arrastre se mueven relati
Page 90 and 91:
evidencia, de que ellas pueden ser
Page 92 and 93:
aptitud biológica o las tasas de m
Page 94 and 95:
Amos, 1988, D. Shaver, PAIS, comuni
Page 96 and 97:
Samuel et al. (2005) midieron los n
Page 98 and 99:
inspección subsiguiente reveló ab
Page 100 and 101:
esultado de 22 experimentos de inve
Page 102 and 103:
conservación; asimismo se deben re
Page 104 and 105:
anidación de México y EE.UU. Este
Page 106 and 107:
1112. Desarrollar e implementar un
Page 108 and 109:
nidos que se encuentran en el estad
Page 110 and 111:
Un “área marina protegida” (MP
Page 112 and 113:
214. Desarrollar planes de manejo d
Page 114 and 115:
epresentativos, de toda su área de
Page 116 and 117:
quizá necesiten utilizar TEDs, dep
Page 118 and 119: exploración adecuada en todas las
Page 120 and 121: de intervención médica mejoraría
Page 122 and 123: al medio natural, pueda exponerlos
Page 124 and 125: EE.UU., (Padre Norte y Sur, y la Pl
Page 126 and 127: ealizarse mediante un memorando de
Page 128 and 129: marinas obtenidas en forma ilegal,
Page 130 and 131: Prioridad 3 Categoría de Acciones
Page 138 and 139: PÁGINA DEJADA EN BLANCO DE MANERA
Page 140 and 141: Baur, G. 1890. The genera of the Ch
Page 142 and 143: (compilers). Proceedings of the Thi
Page 144 and 145: Clark, J.A., J.M. Hoekstra, P.D. Bo
Page 146 and 147: Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2
Page 148 and 149: Camaron del Golfo de Mexico y el Ma
Page 150 and 151: Gracia, A. 1995. Impacto de la pesc
Page 152 and 153: turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) from
Page 154 and 155: Lawler, J.J., S.P. Campbell, A.D. G
Page 156 and 157: Mann, T.M. 1977. Impact of develope
Page 158 and 159: (compilers), Proceedings of the Ele
Page 160 and 161: National Marine Fisheries Service.
Page 162 and 163: Orphanides, C.D. and G.M. Magnusson
Page 164 and 165: Farfantepenaeus duorarum (Decapoda:
Page 166 and 167: Schmid, J.R. and W.J. Barichivich.
Page 170 and 171: Smith, H.M. and R.B. Smith. 1979. S
Page 172 and 173: hatchling sea turtles. Journal of E
Page 174 and 175: orientation of hatchling loggerhead
Page 176 and 177: Alteraciones de Ecosistemas, Contam
Page 178 and 179: edad; sin embargo, las poblaciones
Page 180 and 181: Tabla A1-1. Categorías de Amenaza
Page 182 and 183: Tabla A1-1. Categorías de Amenaza
Page 184 and 185: Tabla A1-3. Clave que se utiliza pa
Page 186 and 187: Tabla A1-5. Mortalidad anual para c
Page 188 and 189: Tabla A1-7 Mortalidad anual para US
Page 190 and 191: Tabla A1-9. La mortalidad anual par
Page 192 and 193: Tabla A1-11. La mortalidad anual pa
Page 194: Tabla A1-13. La mortalidad anual pa
show all

Plan Binacional para la Recuperación de la Tortuga Lora ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?