saturs - rpiva
saturs - rpiva
saturs - rpiva
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
VIKTORIE KLÍMOVÁ, VLADIMÍR ZÍTEK<br />
Masaryk University, Czech Republic<br />
INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Introduction. Innovations are considered as the main factor of competitiveness increasing,<br />
but for improving of competitiveness it is also necessary to evaluate the innovation<br />
performance.<br />
The Aim of the Study. To evaluate the innovation performance of the Czech Republic, namely<br />
on the national and regional level.<br />
Materials and methods. The article is based on the results of the European Innovation<br />
Scoreboard which is annually published by the European Commission and on the results of<br />
Czech statistical survey on innovations which is carried out every two years in accordance<br />
with methodology of Oslo Manual.<br />
Main results. The Czech Republic is moderate innovator with innovation performance below<br />
the EU27 average. The Czech Republic is doing well especially in the dimension Economic<br />
effects, but on the contrary, it is doing poorly in the dimensions Finance and support and<br />
Throughputs. The Czech Republic has below-average share of innovative firms. The share of<br />
innovative enterprises is higher in manufacturing than in services and it is increasing with<br />
size of the firms. It is possible to say that the cost factors are the biggest barriers for Czech<br />
innovative enterprises.<br />
Conclusions. The Czech Republic should attend its attention to support of cooperation, risk<br />
capital and patenting. But the public support should be precisely evaluated.<br />
Keywords: Innovation performance, evaluation, scoreboard, survey<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
After the access to the EU Czech firms have to (as well as enterprises in all new<br />
member states) compete on single European market which is characterized by high freedom<br />
and thus by more severe competition. Furthermore, in existing global world the enterprises<br />
have face competition from other countries. Low-cost strategy isn’t sustainable in future, it is<br />
necessary to use so competition advantages as innovation ability of enterprises, qualification<br />
and mobility of human resources, research and technology.<br />
Innovations are considered as the main factor of increasing of competitiveness of<br />
regions, national economics as well as of supranational corporations. One of the first authors<br />
who connected economic growth and business cycles with innovations was J. A. Schumpeter,<br />
Austrian-American economist. In his book “The theory of economic development” (originally<br />
in 1912) he considered the innovations to being the critical dimension of economic change.<br />
He also proclaimed that the innovations cause "creative destruction" in economics and<br />
consequently it results in economic growth (Schumpeter, 1987). Contemporary theories<br />
concerned with factors of competitiveness in developed countries connect their competitive<br />
advantage primarily with conditions for development of innovations in businesses. A higher<br />
level of innovations also brings a higher added value of products and therefore a higher<br />
growth of the living standard (Kučera, Pazour, 2009). Up-to-date innovation systems leave<br />
the linear concept of innovations, where the research and development have to be at the<br />
beginning of the innovation process, and convert to interactive concepts of innovations. These<br />
new concepts say that innovations are results of interactions among individual participants of<br />
the innovation process and new knowledge (research and development) can enter into this<br />
process during any of its phases (Lundval, 1992). The innovations attract attention of<br />
115