07.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION<br />

If one looks at the moments in history when<br />

literary works toppled the taboos of the ruling<br />

morals or offered the reader new solutions for<br />

the moral casuistry of his lived praxis, which<br />

thereafter could be sanctioned by the<br />

consensus of all readers in the society then a<br />

still-little-studied area of research opens itself<br />

up to the literary historian.<br />

Hans Robert Jauss, Literary History<br />

as a Challenge to Literary Theory<br />

Literary works that question ruling conventions by shocking their audiences and<br />

arousing controversy are frequently dubbed “transgressive.” They are often regarded as<br />

potentially subversive by institutional authorities because they transgress social and/or<br />

cultural taboos and prohibitions. More specifically, it appears that these prohibitions—<br />

and the inclination to violate them—are commonly related to the natural drives of sex and<br />

aggression, and transgressive works typically depict these instincts in gruesome and<br />

abhorrent ways.<br />

In the two texts chosen for this study, Matthew Lewis’ The Monk and Bret Easton<br />

Ellis’ American Psycho, both widely considered transgressive, these drives are<br />

graphically literalized in explicit accounts of sex and violence. By depicting these social<br />

taboos, both Lewis and Ellis not only challenged the social guidelines that govern these<br />

moral prohibitions, their publication has also spurred major controversy, which<br />

contributed to positioning them in the annals of literary history next to other scandalous<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!