Trial of the Major War Criminals before International Military Tribunal ...

C o m m u n e s (Table 2 and Diagram 4):
Hodslavice 99.90°/o Czechs 0.05°/o Germans
Stramberk 98.6Z0/o " 1.30°/o "
PoliEka (Bohemia) 96.84OIo " 2.45O/o "
, PEibor 95.14O/o " 4.4Z0/o "
Klimkovice 92.OO0/o " 7.18O/o "
Mor. Krumlov 89.46OIo ." 10.25O/o "
HluEin 89.18% " 10.45O/0 "
Kopfivnice 86.3g0/o " 13.54OIo "
BEeclav 83.41°/o " 11.76°/o "
ZBbEeh 68.77O/o " 30.960/0 "
Znojmo 64.2g0/o " 33.25O10 "
Although the Munich Agreement and the Berlin decisions as
to occupation concern only Germany directly, and left the terri-
torial adjustments between Poland and Hungary on one side and
the Czechoslovak Republic on the other to form the subject of
direct negotiations between the Governments concerned, the maps
of the territory and communes occupied by Poland likewise show
a marked discrepancy as regards the letter and spirit of the Munich
Agreement.
Thus, the following predominantly or almost entirely Czech areas
were occupied by Poland:
Districts (Table 1 and Diagram 3):
FryStat 65.15OIo Czechs 25.57O/o Poles
C o m m u n e s (Table 2 and Diagram 4):
PetEvald 95.88O/o Czechs 1.24O/o Poles
OrlovA 81.05O/o " 13.93010 "
Nov9 Bohumin 49.14°/o " 7.25O10 "
Cesk9 T6Sin 45.35OIo " 15.04°/o "
encl.to pt.111.
- Page 39 ­
(3) It would be wrong to take as a basis of the occupation the
results of the 1910 census, partly because the nationality conditions
have changed in the course of 28 years as a result of the national
movement of population, partly also because the 1910 census did
not establish nationality (as did the census carried out in Czecho-
slovakia in 1920 and 1930), but recorded only the "Umgangssprache"
i. e. the language commonly used by each individual.
As a result of this criterion the figures relating to the Germans
included also the Jews, of whom there was a considerable percentage