08.09.2016 Aufrufe

Intensivmedizin Fragen und Antworten

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

240 Kapitel 13 · Klinische Studien<br />

jAutopsieergebnisse zeigen klinisch relevante Zusatzdiagnosen bei<br />

Intensivpatienten<br />

Tejerina E, Esteban A, Fernández-Segoviano P, María Rodríguez-Barbero J, Gordo F,<br />

Frutos-Vivar F, Aramburu J, Algaba A, Gonzalo Salcedo García O, Lorente JA (2012) Clinical<br />

diagnoses and autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill patients. Crit Care 40 (3):<br />

842–6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f64f<br />

Objectives To determine the proportion of clinical errors by comparing<br />

clinical and pathological diagnoses, and to evaluate changes of errors over time.<br />

Design We conducted a prospective study of all consecutive autopsies performed<br />

on patients who died in the intensive care unit of the Hospital Universitario<br />

de Getafe, Madrid, Spain, between January 1982 and December 2007.<br />

The diagnostic errors were classified in two categories: class I errors that were<br />

major misdiagnoses with direct impact on therapy, and class II diagnostic<br />

errors which comprised major unexpected findings that probably would not<br />

have changed therapy.<br />

Results Of 2,857 deaths during the study period, autopsies were performed in<br />

866 patients (30.3 %). Autopsy reports were available in 834 patients, of whom<br />

63 (7.5 %) had class I errors and 95 (11.4 %) had type II errors. The most frequently<br />

missed diagnoses were pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, secondary<br />

peritonitis, invasive aspergillosis, endocarditis and myocardial infarction. The<br />

autopsy did not determine the cause of death in 22 patients (2.6 %). Our rate of<br />

diagnostic discrepancy remained relatively constant over time, and the conditions<br />

leading to discrepancies have slightly changed, with pneumonia showing<br />

a decline in diagnostic accuracy in the last years.<br />

Conclusion This study fo<strong>und</strong> significant discrepancies in 18.5 % of patients<br />

who <strong>und</strong>erwent autopsy, 7.5 % of them were diagnoses with impact on therapy<br />

and outcome. This reinforces the importance of the postmortem examination<br />

in confirming diagnostic accuracy and improving the quality of care of critically<br />

ill patients.<br />

Fazit<br />

Die Autopsie bleibt auch in der modernen <strong>Intensivmedizin</strong> ein wichtiges Element<br />

der Qualitätssicherung unter dem Motto »mortui vivos docent«.

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!