21.02.2013 Views

The Canadian Army Journal

The Canadian Army Journal

The Canadian Army Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NOTE TO FILE—REACHING INTO THE ORACLE:<br />

REFLECTIONS OF A COLD WARRIOR ON THE ISSUES AND<br />

CHALLENGES IN DEFENCE<br />

Shaye K. Friesen<br />

In antiquity, individuals sought out the advice of expert advisors at oracular sites<br />

such as Delphi or the Temple of Ascleipeus. For most contemporary defence and<br />

security matters, however, advice is gathered from colleagues or immediate co-workers<br />

within the same chain of command. <strong>The</strong> limited availability of subject matter experts and<br />

short deadlines required to produce deliverables impose constraints on our ability to<br />

consult with experts in the broader defence and security network. Because the<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> Forces (CF) don’t know what they don’t know, the benefits of working with<br />

other agencies and outside experts, such as transferring experience, developing a<br />

network of trust and information sharing, can be squandered.<br />

Fortunately, the basic principles of policy and strategy formulation remind us that,<br />

when developing a strategy, it is important to create synergy by consulting a larger stable<br />

of experts to generate support and develop content. This involves casting as wide a net<br />

as possible and engaging in a dialogue and debate that provokes critical thinking before<br />

(not after) strategies are developed and implemented. Often the experience and<br />

expertise of external advisors yield rich dividends because they are able to shed new<br />

light on existing problems and present concepts in innovative ways that have not been<br />

previously been considered. Just as the advice from the oracle played an important role<br />

helping understand issues ranging from everyday life to geopolitics, so too should we<br />

benefit from the specialized knowledge of modern day of subject matter experts.<br />

Enter Dr. George Lindsey. Dr Lindsey served in the Royal <strong>Canadian</strong> Artillery during<br />

the Second World War, and with the British and <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> Operational Research<br />

Groups. He later became the Chief of the Operational Research and Analysis<br />

Establishment (ORAE) in National Defence Headquarters (NDHQ) in 1967, and held this<br />

position until his retirement in 1987. During this time, he became one of the most<br />

influential people responsible for moulding the direction of <strong>Canadian</strong> defence science<br />

during the Cold War. As 2007 marked the launch of the 60th anniversary of defence<br />

science in Canada, it is important to pay tribute and recognize those who have<br />

contributed to building defence science. <strong>The</strong> Centre for Operational Research (CORA)<br />

offers a wealth of expertise and brings together different scientific disciplines together<br />

that provide enhanced analytical support for the CF. Old-timers such as Dr Lindsey can<br />

be used as strategic “force multipliers” on a part time basis, or employed as peer<br />

reviewers to ensure the best possible advice is provided to the CF. <strong>The</strong>y may have even<br />

encountered similar problems in the past that could lend assistance to priority research<br />

areas.<br />

In a time of constant change, it is necessary to pause and gather our thoughts by<br />

reflecting on the past, using the past to gain a broader understanding of how people in<br />

our organization approached similar problems in the past, and how we can build on this<br />

knowledge today. This article unearths some high-level guidelines to better illustrate<br />

how contemporary issues and challenges in military operational research (OR) have<br />

some historical precedent from which valuable observations, insights and lessons can<br />

be drawn. In doing so, it demonstrates how the knowledge and experience of senior<br />

members of the defence scientific community can be applied to provide meaningful<br />

context and clarification for today’s defence and security challenges.<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> Vol. 11.1 Spring 2008 113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!