21.02.2013 Views

The Canadian Army Journal

The Canadian Army Journal

The Canadian Army Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13. Ibid.<br />

14. G.R. Lindsey, Strategy and Economics of Intercontinental Missile Defence, ORD Informal Paper No. 66/P23 (Ottawa:<br />

National Defence, Operational Research Division, October 1966).<br />

15. Interview, op. cit.<br />

16. Ibid.<br />

17. Ibid.<br />

18. Ibid.<br />

19. For an outstanding treatment on <strong>Canadian</strong> science in the Second World War involving the first-hand contributions of<br />

war-time scientists, see George R. Lindsey, (ed)., No Day Long Enough.<br />

20. For more information on this topic, see: G. R. Lindsey, <strong>Canadian</strong> Maritime Strategy: Should the Emphasis be Change?<br />

DRAE Report no. 5 (Ottawa: Defence Research Analysis Establishment, July 1969).<br />

21. Interview, op. cit.<br />

22. Ibid.<br />

23. G. R. Lindsey, <strong>The</strong> Allocation of Resources in an Alliance, ORD Informal Paper No. 65/P13 (Ottawa, National Defence,<br />

Operational Research Division, August 1965).<br />

24. Interview, op. cit.<br />

25. George Lindsey, “Potential contributions by the <strong>Canadian</strong> Armed Forces to the defence of North America against<br />

terrorism,” International <strong>Journal</strong> Vol. LVIII, No. 3 (Summer 2003), pp-309-334.<br />

26. If reports on targets are intermittent, non-continuous and it is difficult to get an exact “fix” on the target’s location<br />

because of limitations in seeing through clutter such as clouds, there may be intermittent signals that can be exploited to<br />

see objects. See George R. Lindsey, “Interception Strategy based on Intermittent Information,” Operations Research<br />

Vol.16, No. 3 (May-June 1968), pp. 489-508.<br />

27. Interview, op. cit.<br />

28. Ibid.<br />

29. Ibid.<br />

30. Kalev I. Sepp, “Best Practices in Counterinsurgency,” Military Review (May-June 2005), pp. 8-12.<br />

31. Interview, op. cit.<br />

32. “Building on Success: <strong>The</strong> London Conference on Afghanistan 31 January—1 February 2006: <strong>The</strong> Afghanistan<br />

Compact,” Available at: http://www.unama-afg.org/news/_londonConf/_docs/06jan30-AfghanistanCompact-Final.pdf<br />

33. G.R. Lindsey, “<strong>The</strong> Roles of Radar,” <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> Vol.5, No.11 (February 1952), pp. 17-31.<br />

34. Interview, op. cit.<br />

35. Ibid.<br />

36. George Lindsey, <strong>The</strong> Information Requirements for Aerospace Defence: <strong>The</strong> Limits Impose by Geometry and<br />

Technology, Bailrigg Memorandum 27 (Lancaster University: Centre for Defence and International Security Studies, 1997).<br />

37. For example, Dr Lindsey used the example of how a family of two-dimensional charts linking numbers of weapons to<br />

deterrence strategies facilitated the ability of the analyst to convey a message and explore possibilities. <strong>The</strong> relationships<br />

between strategic nuclear warheads, deterrence and <strong>Canadian</strong> security are recurring themes in Dr Lindsey’s writings. For<br />

a more detailed explanation of the charts, consult: George Lindsey, Strategic Nuclear Weapons: Fewer Would Be Better<br />

but Zero Would Be Imprudent (Waterloo: <strong>The</strong> Laurier Centre for Military Strategic and Disarmament Studies, ND). George<br />

R. Lindsey, <strong>The</strong> Strategic Defence of North America (Toronto: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Canadian</strong> Institute of Strategic Studies, 1986) contains<br />

insights on strategic nuclear deterrence developments.<br />

120 <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> Vol. 11.1 Spring 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!