The Canadian Army Journal
The Canadian Army Journal
The Canadian Army Journal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
armoured squadron, administration company or MP platoon. In the planned future,<br />
dismounted close fire will be transformed under several projects: Small Arms<br />
Replacement Project II (SARP II), Advanced Lightweight Anti-Armour Weapon System<br />
(ALAAWS) and Close Area Suppression Weapon (CASW). SARP II recognises its<br />
scope to include “the pistol, C7 Assault Rifle and associated grenade launcher, C8<br />
Carbine, C9 Light Machine Gun (LMG), C6 General Purpose Machine Gun (GPMG), .50<br />
cal Heavy Machine Gun (HMG) and other special purpose small arms.” While SARP II<br />
will take a system view of a portion of the dismounted close fire capability, a better more<br />
comprehensive view is possible.<br />
Close and far fire will achieve greatest effects when fed information through greater sensing<br />
capabilities. Skylark and company UAVs are a step in this direction<br />
Consider that area suppression can be accomplished with machine guns, automatic<br />
grenade launchers (ALGs), things in between—the American XM307 Advanced Crew-<br />
Served Weapon (ACSW)—and light mortars. Currently there are strong objections<br />
within the Infantry Corps to replacing the 60 mm mortars with the CASW despite a<br />
comparison of the two weapons which found that in isolation the CASW met far more<br />
capability requirements than the 60 mm. <strong>The</strong> system view would compare aggregate<br />
results of platoons and companies incorporating rifles, LMGs, GPMGs, HMGs,<br />
VHMGs/ACSWs, AGLs, missiles and light mortars. Only analysis conducted by varying<br />
the weapon systems at this aggregate level is able to determine which combination of<br />
weapons is optimal and which weapons are essential. Also drawn out of this aggregate<br />
analysis are conclusions on force structure such as location and numbers of designated<br />
marksmen.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, SARP II should be prepared to examine the full suite of dismounted close<br />
fire systems even if it will not replace all such weapons. This will ensure essential<br />
capabilities are not “traded off” and that we are not replacing weapon types one for one<br />
when it would make more senses to replace two systems for three newer systems (or<br />
vice versa).<br />
<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> Vol. 11.1 Spring 2008<br />
Photo Source: Combat Camera<br />
73