21.02.2013 Views

The Canadian Army Journal

The Canadian Army Journal

The Canadian Army Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

armoured squadron, administration company or MP platoon. In the planned future,<br />

dismounted close fire will be transformed under several projects: Small Arms<br />

Replacement Project II (SARP II), Advanced Lightweight Anti-Armour Weapon System<br />

(ALAAWS) and Close Area Suppression Weapon (CASW). SARP II recognises its<br />

scope to include “the pistol, C7 Assault Rifle and associated grenade launcher, C8<br />

Carbine, C9 Light Machine Gun (LMG), C6 General Purpose Machine Gun (GPMG), .50<br />

cal Heavy Machine Gun (HMG) and other special purpose small arms.” While SARP II<br />

will take a system view of a portion of the dismounted close fire capability, a better more<br />

comprehensive view is possible.<br />

Close and far fire will achieve greatest effects when fed information through greater sensing<br />

capabilities. Skylark and company UAVs are a step in this direction<br />

Consider that area suppression can be accomplished with machine guns, automatic<br />

grenade launchers (ALGs), things in between—the American XM307 Advanced Crew-<br />

Served Weapon (ACSW)—and light mortars. Currently there are strong objections<br />

within the Infantry Corps to replacing the 60 mm mortars with the CASW despite a<br />

comparison of the two weapons which found that in isolation the CASW met far more<br />

capability requirements than the 60 mm. <strong>The</strong> system view would compare aggregate<br />

results of platoons and companies incorporating rifles, LMGs, GPMGs, HMGs,<br />

VHMGs/ACSWs, AGLs, missiles and light mortars. Only analysis conducted by varying<br />

the weapon systems at this aggregate level is able to determine which combination of<br />

weapons is optimal and which weapons are essential. Also drawn out of this aggregate<br />

analysis are conclusions on force structure such as location and numbers of designated<br />

marksmen.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, SARP II should be prepared to examine the full suite of dismounted close<br />

fire systems even if it will not replace all such weapons. This will ensure essential<br />

capabilities are not “traded off” and that we are not replacing weapon types one for one<br />

when it would make more senses to replace two systems for three newer systems (or<br />

vice versa).<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> Vol. 11.1 Spring 2008<br />

Photo Source: Combat Camera<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!