21.02.2013 Views

The Canadian Army Journal

The Canadian Army Journal

The Canadian Army Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138<br />

strategic importance to the rest of the world.” Dyer admits that even though this will<br />

probably result in a considerable amount of bloodshed and a fundamental transformation<br />

of the political landscape, ultimately the region will sort itself out for the better.<br />

Superficially, the book may appear to be yet another diatribe against American<br />

foreign policies and the intelligence of the current American administration. Indeed, from<br />

the patronage of Israel to its stance on Iran’s nuclear ambitions, Dyer is uncompromising<br />

in his critique of American foreign policy in the Middle East. <strong>The</strong>re is also an unflinching<br />

attack against the neoconservatives, whose motives Dyer connects to efforts to maintain<br />

the superpower status of the United States via control of China’s sources of oil imports.<br />

Yet beyond this lies the true value of this study, namely Dyer’s commendable effort<br />

to piece together the vast cultural, religious, political and historical mosaic of the region.<br />

All too frequently, geopolitical assessments have tended to focus almost exclusively<br />

upon one particular aspect or another, resulting in an incomplete picture. While some of<br />

his points are certainly debatable, Dyer’s systematic breakdown of the internal social<br />

and political dynamics of Middle Eastern countries reveals a host of motivations and selfinterests.<br />

Contrary to the fears of some political analysts, these pose an almost<br />

insurmountable barrier to the emergence of any unified ‘Shia crescent’ or new Caliphate.<br />

Even if Islamist governments should emerge in the aftermath of any American<br />

withdrawal, Dyer notes they are unlikely to be as rabidly fanatical as is feared. Moreover,<br />

their ascension to power might turn out to be a good thing. With the Americans out of the<br />

region, a great deal of their ideological thunder would be rendered mute and they would<br />

be left with the much more difficult task of running a country. Should their efforts be less<br />

than successful, it is utterly conceivable that their populations, tiring of their religious<br />

zeal, would turn to more prosperous democratic forms of government. While many of the<br />

other possible outcomes Dyer details are bleak or utterly catastrophic, and include ethnic<br />

cleansing and the use of nuclear weapons, instead of unrealistic fears they are based<br />

upon solid assessments and a comprehensive understanding of the forces at work.<br />

Admittedly, despite the breadth of Dyer’s coverage, his account is a journalistic<br />

assessment rather than an academic study. <strong>The</strong> lack of a bibliography, footnotes, or an<br />

index undermines what would otherwise have been an extremely insightful and useful<br />

source to further the study of the issues it addresses. Moreover, little or no mention was<br />

made of the past, present, or future involvement of Russia, China, or Europe in the<br />

region. Even if the United States has played the greatest role, it would be naïve to<br />

assume that it has been the only force influencing and shaping events in the Middle East.<br />

Even though such omissions detract somewhat from its comprehensiveness, they<br />

do not compromise the significance of this study. Easy to read and written in an informal<br />

tone, <strong>The</strong> Mess <strong>The</strong>y Made is an important starting point for any informed speculation<br />

regarding the transformation of the Middle East in a post-Iraq world.<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> Vol. 11.1 Spring 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!