22.02.2013 Views

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2890_mitigation<br />

13<br />

August 2011<br />

<strong>Galloper</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> Substation<br />

4.0 Proposals<br />

4.1. Agreement of the landscape mitigation strategy with SCDC, SCC and EDF<br />

A draft landscape mitigation strategy was submitted to SCDC and SCC in August 2011<br />

and discussed with them at a meeting on 25 August 2011. The following matters were<br />

agreed with them and incorporated into the revised proposals:<br />

1. Shallower outside slope to the landform, approximately 1:10 being seen as a<br />

good fall to aim for.<br />

2. North and south slopes were seen as the most important as these were the<br />

edges visible from public locations (Sizewell Gap road to the south and the<br />

bridleway on Sandy Lane to the north).<br />

3. The general height of the landform was considered to be acceptable (being<br />

16.5mAOD on the southern and western sides and 15mAOD on the northern<br />

side) and could be varied slightly from these levels as the design develops. The<br />

height of the landform on the northern side could be increased so that it is<br />

nearer to 16.5mAOD.<br />

4. Introduce some variety into the top level so that it is not seen as a straight<br />

horizontal line.<br />

5. Levels and slopes can be varied depending on quantity of material available.<br />

6. The draft proposals showed narrower woodland planting on the north side (in<br />

Broom Covert) than on the western and southern sides, to enable acid<br />

grassland to be re-instated in Broom Covert. It was agreed that the woodland<br />

should be widened on this side to increase screening. The landscape / AONB<br />

benefits of widening the woodland and landform into Broom Covert were<br />

considered to outweigh the negative effects on biodiversity, given that the<br />

landscape has national statutory protection whereas Broom Covert does not<br />

carry any statutory protection.<br />

7. Hedgerows are not necessarily appropriate between fields given the approach<br />

likely to be followed for EDF’s Sizewell Vision for the area and should be<br />

removed from the proposals. The enhancement to the roadside hedge (on<br />

Sizewell Gap road) is appropriate and should be kept in the proposals.<br />

8. Increase percentage of Scots pine in the proposed woodland mix to 30 – 50%.<br />

9. Hedge planting to be predominantly hawthorn with a small proportion of<br />

blackthorn. (Note, Christine Blythe, Biodiversity Manager for EDF<br />

subsequently recommended avoiding the use of blackthorn as she has found<br />

that it does not establish – see Appendix 3.)<br />

10. Increase the width of the ‘woodland edge planting with open grassland’ on the<br />

outside edge of the proposed woodland and create more gradual gradation<br />

from woodland to less dense woodland to shrubs to grassland.<br />

11. Retain the 10m woodland strip to the east of the bridleway in the landscape<br />

mitigation proposals.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!