22.02.2013 Views

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2842_SLVIA<br />

42<br />

5.0 The Existing Visual Environment<br />

5.1. Introduction<br />

5.1.1. The purpose of the visual assessment is to first determine the extent of the<br />

ZTV of the development (the area of land and sea from within which it may<br />

be possible to see any part of the proposed development) and to determine<br />

how visible the proposed development would be from a range of agreed<br />

representative viewpoints and from this, the likely effects on various visual<br />

receptor groups.<br />

5.1.2. Refer to Figure 06 (Topography and Viewpoints) and Figures 04 and 05 (ZTV<br />

Bare Ground and ZTV Obstructions).<br />

5.2. Initial ZTV<br />

5.2.1. At the outset of the assessment, an initial computer generated ZTV study was<br />

used to help identify areas from within which the site could potentially be<br />

visible. The 72 number 7MW WTGs presented a worst-case scenario, with a<br />

hub height of 120m and a blade tip of 195m. The computer generated bare<br />

ground ZTV, to nacelle and blade tip (see Figure 04), identifies key stretches<br />

of the landscape from which the proposed offshore wind farm may be<br />

theoretically visible within the agreed 45km radius study area.<br />

5.2.2. The bare ground ZTV makes no allowance for any screening effects that may<br />

arise due to existing vegetation or built development. As a result it gives an<br />

exaggerated impression of the potential degree of visual exposure of a<br />

proposed development and therefore presents an unrealistic worst-case<br />

scenario. To limit this exaggerated impression, significant existing<br />

settlements and woodland have been incorporated into the terrain model to<br />

provide a more realistic impression of anticipated visibility, as illustrated on<br />

Figure 05. It should be noted, however, that the predicted extent of the<br />

proposed development’s visibility shown on the ZTVs is never more than<br />

theoretical in its extent. For example, if an area is not shaded it indicates that<br />

the target point is not likely to be visible from a 1.6m high eye level view;<br />

whereas if an area is shaded it indicates that the target may (but may not) be<br />

visible. It may also be possible that local features not included within the<br />

model, for example hedgerows, embankments and buildings, will locally<br />

screen views towards the target point. Given that GWF is relatively far<br />

offshore the smallest of variations in localised landform and screening<br />

elements onshore will curtail many seaward views of GWF<br />

5.2.3. Appendix 3 details the methodology used for creating the ZTVs and visuals.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!