22.02.2013 Views

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

From: Peter.Holborn@suffolk.gov.uk<br />

To: Colin.McAllister@rwe.com<br />

Cc: John.Pitchford@suffolk.gov.uk; Sue.Hooton@suffolk.gov.uk; phil.watson@suffolk.gov.uk;<br />

Nick.Collinson@suffolk.gov.uk; Bob.Chamberlain@SuffolkCoastal.gov.uk<br />

Subject: RE: <strong>Galloper</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> - onshore landscape changes<br />

Date: 09 September 2011 14:40:09<br />

Dear Colin,<br />

Further to your e-mail 5th Sept, I should like to offer the following informal comments on behalf of<br />

Suffolk County Council.<br />

1. I confirm the draft minutes are an accurate record of our meeting on 25th August.<br />

2. Proposed landform: I appreciate the efforts that have been made to improve the visual impact of<br />

the earthworks particularly to the north of the site in the area of Broom Covert towards Sandy<br />

Lane. I note from the cross-section provided on Drg No. 2890/11B that the angle of the outer face<br />

of the slope fronting the road has been reduced to 1:10; I consider that this is the very minimum<br />

land take and earth modelling that is acceptable to ameliorate the inevitable adverse impact on the<br />

AONB. If at all possible the toe of the proposed embankment should be extended further south to<br />

marry in with point in the arable field just north of the 400KV pylons lines where the natural<br />

contours start to steepen. This would avoid creating a "bench like" feature in the field between to<br />

steeper slopes. It would be helpful if the cross section provided on Dwg No 2890/11B was<br />

extended to show the relationship with existing ground levels up to the road.<br />

3. Planting/Landscape Mitigation: I consider that the planting and other vegetation establishment<br />

principles shown on Drg No 2890/07F are technically sound, and provide scope to allow the<br />

creation of a heathland/open woodland matrix beyond the boundary of the GWF works according to<br />

the emerging Vision for EdF's landownership on the Sizewell Estate. .<br />

4. AONB Fund; I consider the suggested 5 year period of the 106 contribution is too short. If we<br />

use the period of the adverse residual impact upon the AONB as a yardstick then 25 years would<br />

seem more appropriate.<br />

I hope you find these comments useful in your discussions with EdF and preparation of your DCO,<br />

Regards<br />

Peter<br />

Peter Holborn<br />

Landscape and Biodiversity Team Leader<br />

Countryside Service<br />

Economy, Skills and Environment<br />

Suffolk County Council<br />

Endeavour House<br />

8 Russell Road<br />

Ipswich<br />

Suffolk<br />

IP1 2BX<br />

tel 01473 264778<br />

07710 588200<br />

e:mail peter.holborn@suffolk.gov.uk<br />

From: Colin.McAllister@rwe.com [mailto:Colin.McAllister@rwe.com]<br />

Sent: 05 September 2011 12:26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!