22.02.2013 Views

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

Galloper Wind Farm Project - National Infrastructure Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2842_SLVIA<br />

96<br />

8.5.5. Given the sense of distance from the proposed WTGs from the coast, the vast<br />

extents of the existing seaward panorama and available seaward horizon line<br />

that will remain unaffected by combined visual effects of the two schemes,<br />

the magnitude of cumulative effect arising from the addition of the GWF to<br />

the existing GGOWF when viewed from this 15 to 20km section of coastline<br />

is judged to be Low to Negligible.<br />

8.5.6. Views towards the proposed WTGs in combination and succession with the<br />

WTGs of the London Array and Gunfleet Sands wind farms along the coast<br />

north of Orford Ness are Negligible in magnitude and significance due, in<br />

part, to the screening effect of the headland at Orford Ness and, in part, to the<br />

distance of these schemes from this stretch of coastline. South of Thorpe<br />

Ness, the southern cluster of proposed GWF WTGs will be visible in<br />

combination with the WTGs of the London Array wind farm. South of<br />

Orford Ness The proposed GWF as a whole will also be seen in succession<br />

with firstly the London Array wind farm and then with the Gunfleet Sands<br />

wind farm as part of the sweeping view available along the coast, panning<br />

from east to south. As described above, however, the proposed WTGs will<br />

not significantly alter the existing cumulative effects arising from the<br />

GGOWF as seen in combination with the London Array and Gunfleet Sands<br />

wind farms. The magnitude of cumulative effect arising from combined<br />

views with the London Array wind farm and views seen in succession with<br />

the Gunfleet Sands wind farm is judged, therefore, to be Negligible.<br />

Offshore Receptors<br />

8.5.7. Offshore receptors located to the west of GGOWF will see the WTGs at GWF<br />

in the context of those at GGOWF in the foreground, except towards the<br />

south where a small part of GWF lies west of GGOWF. GGOWF will, in most<br />

instances, be the most prominent WTGs in views, with the WTGs at GWF<br />

seen beyond those at GGOWF, increasing the density and possibly the spread<br />

of WTGs in the view.<br />

8.5.8. In conditions of suitable visibility, offshore receptors on the sea between<br />

Felixstowe and GGOWF will currently, looking from left to right, see<br />

GGOWF, then London Array and then Gunfleet Sands wind farms. GWF will<br />

increase the density and spread of WTGs in the vicinity of the existing WTGs<br />

at GGOWF, within views that are already characterised by wind farms. The<br />

East Anglia ONE site will lie at approximately 50km or greater from this area<br />

of sea. Details of WTG types or locations are not available but, if the WTGs<br />

are 120m hub height and 195m blade tip height, for receptors at sea level<br />

hubs are unlikely to be visible beyond approximately 45km. Even when<br />

visibility conditions are excellent, development of the East Anglia ONE site is<br />

likely to have no greater than Negligible visual effects from this area.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!