26.03.2013 Views

Lost River - Karst Information Portal

Lost River - Karst Information Portal

Lost River - Karst Information Portal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2007 NSS Convention Guidebook<br />

Indiana University. A new series of dye traces<br />

associated with the Indiana Department of<br />

Transportation and some regional groundwater<br />

quality studies have resulted in many more<br />

since 1992 as discussed below. (KS).<br />

The <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong> topographic watershed<br />

above the True Rise of <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong> can be<br />

divided into three parts on the basis of tracing<br />

the normal and low-flow subterranean drainage<br />

(Figure 30). The northeastern part includes<br />

about 40.7 square miles in the Crawford<br />

Upland and Mitchell Plain that is tributary to<br />

the rise at Orangeville. The central portion is<br />

mostly within the Mitchell Plain and covers<br />

about 107.8 square miles of drainage, including<br />

the upper part of the <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong>, which is<br />

tributary to the True Rise of <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong>. This<br />

portion includes the major part of the dry bed<br />

and sinkhole plain area commonly associated<br />

with <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong>. The remaining part is the karst<br />

valley of the South Fork of Stamper Creek<br />

that is tributary to Lick Creek, an area of 14.5<br />

square miles. Flood flows within the entire<br />

drainage basin fill the subterranean conduits<br />

and overflow into surface flood channels or dry<br />

beds, ultimately to discharge into <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong>.<br />

Modern flood flows essentially reoccupy the late<br />

Tertiary or early Pleistocene surface routes that<br />

were regularly used prior to the development<br />

of karst features and caverns during early and<br />

middle Pleistocene time. Surficial stream<br />

meanders are incised into both alluvium and<br />

bedrock, but demonstrate that the <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />

has in the past acted like a regular river during<br />

flood events, and continues to do so today.<br />

The northern boundary of the <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />

drainage basin with the Mitchell Plain is drawn<br />

(Figure 40) along a low topographic divide.<br />

Drainage to the north is to the East Fork White<br />

<strong>River</strong> through such caverns as Blue Spring Cave<br />

(Palmer, 1968), the three river caves in Cave<br />

<strong>River</strong> Valley, and the Donaldson-Twin Caves<br />

which drain the sinks of Mosquito Creek<br />

(Brune (1949) and Powell (1961) pp 60–61,<br />

63, and 73).<br />

Malott (1952) suggested that the drainage<br />

of the dismembered portions of Beaver<br />

Creek, including areas to the northwest of<br />

150<br />

Wadsworth Hollow, were tributary to the<br />

rise at Orangeville through caverns such as<br />

Beaver Creek Swallowhole Cave and Salts<br />

Cave. However, the fluorescein test has proven<br />

that the area drains instead to Sulphur Creek,<br />

more or less down the dip of the local bedrock<br />

rather than along the strike (1, Figure 40). The<br />

subterranean gradient from the swallowhole to<br />

the spring on Sulphur Creek is 27 feet per mile,<br />

which is about the same as the local dip of the<br />

bedrock.<br />

Show Farm Cave (2, Figure 40) trends<br />

along strike-oriented joints southward towards<br />

the rise at Orangeville (Powell, 1961, p 102).<br />

The dye test showed that the drainage resurges<br />

at Orangeville. Flood water follows surface<br />

channels of Dry Branch to Orangeville.<br />

Topographic maps show that the area’s<br />

surface drainage is toward Orangeville, but<br />

the divide between subterranean drainage that<br />

is tributary to the rise at Orangeville and that<br />

water which is tributary to the rise of <strong>Lost</strong><br />

<strong>River</strong>, is not discernable on the surface. Two<br />

tests were made to trace subterranean drainage<br />

at Orleans that Malott (1952) suggested was<br />

tributary to the rise at Orangeville. Fluorescein<br />

was dumped into a sinking stream, Flood<br />

Creek, on the west side of the town of Orleans,<br />

and into the sewage plant (3 and 4, Figure 40)<br />

that discharges its wastes into a sinkhole on the<br />

south side of town. Both were detected at the<br />

rise at Orangeville.<br />

Drainage of the upper part of <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong> (5,<br />

Figure 40) was traced to the True Rise of <strong>Lost</strong><br />

<strong>River</strong> about one mile south of Orangeville (C,<br />

Figure 40). The dye test was detected visually in<br />

the rise at Wesley Chapel Gulf, confirming the<br />

studies of Malott (1932). The stream includes<br />

drainage from Carter Creek, and the North<br />

and South Forks of <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong>. Near the sink<br />

where the dye was injected, <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong> is joined<br />

by an upland dry bed that carries overflow flood<br />

waters from the South Fork of Stamper Creek<br />

and joins Stamper Creek and several other<br />

small streams that drain westward off the thick<br />

clay-covered portion of the Mitchell Plain.<br />

The Sinks of Stamper Creek (6, Figure 40)<br />

were traced to the True Rise of <strong>Lost</strong> <strong>River</strong>, not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!