05.04.2013 Views

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

adical in practice than several other aspects <strong>of</strong> European thought in this<br />

period.” 14<br />

David <strong>St</strong>evenson correctly reasons that frequent misuse <strong>of</strong> the word<br />

‘masonic’ to describe “anything combining radical ideas and secrecy…was<br />

illogical and confusing.” 15 This confusion ultimately allowed detractors <strong>of</strong> the<br />

masons to formulate conspiracy theories which asserted that “freemasonry was<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the great causes <strong>of</strong> the French Revolution.” 16 Although there was little<br />

tangible evidence to substantiate such allegations, British freemasonry became<br />

the object <strong>of</strong> much scrutiny and suspicion.<br />

In 1797, amid claims <strong>of</strong> Jacobin lodges in France and seditious and<br />

treasonable activities among German freemasons, John Robison – eminent<br />

mechanical philosopher and pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> natural philosophy at the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Edinburgh – published Pro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and<br />

Governments <strong>of</strong> Europe, Carried on in the Secret Meetings <strong>of</strong> the Freemasons,<br />

Illuminati, and Reading Societies, Collected from Good Authorities. 17<br />

Convinced that all <strong>of</strong> Britain stood on the brink <strong>of</strong> revolution based on the<br />

189<br />

14<br />

Jeremy Black, Eighteenth-Century Europe (London, 1999), 496-497.<br />

15<br />

<strong>St</strong>evenson, Origins, 1-12.<br />

16<br />

Jacob, Living The Enlightenment, 9-10; Abbe de Barruel published a work entitled Memoires<br />

pour servir a l’Historie du Jacobinisme, or Memoris, Illustrating the History <strong>of</strong> Jacobinism<br />

(London, 1798), which condemned freemasonry. He did, however, distinguish between British<br />

and French freemasonry, separating the goals, aims, and circumstances <strong>of</strong> each. For an<br />

additional discussion on freemasonry and the French Revolution, see A. Mellor, “Eighteenth<br />

Century French Freemasonry and the French Revolution,” AQC, 114(2001), 105-114. Michael<br />

Kennedy, in The Jacobin Clubs in the French Revolution: The First Years (Princeton, 1982),<br />

dismisses Barruel’s claims, stating that a “tremendous amount <strong>of</strong> research has been done in<br />

recent years on freemasonry; and while, unfortunately, only a small proportion pertains directly<br />

to the clubs, it is now possible to discard a number <strong>of</strong> once-popular theories about their masonic<br />

origins. Today, only the most imaginative minds could describe the masons as conspirators who<br />

established the clubs as part <strong>of</strong> a grand design to subvert the Church and the Monarchy,” 5.<br />

17<br />

John Robison, Pro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments <strong>of</strong> Europe,<br />

Carried on in the Secret Meetings <strong>of</strong> the Freemasons, Illuminati, and Reading Societies,<br />

Collected from Good Authorities (Edinburgh, 1797).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!