05.04.2013 Views

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

masonic matters. Unfortunately, his involvement would ultimately result in the<br />

failure <strong>of</strong> the Grand Lodge to prevent The Masonic Secession <strong>of</strong> 1808. 104<br />

The Downfall <strong>of</strong> the Grand Lodge<br />

Scottish lodges reacted differently to the actions <strong>of</strong> the Grand Lodge.<br />

No. 25 <strong>St</strong> Andrew, for example, recorded on 27 June 1808 that “from all<br />

Circumstances <strong>of</strong> the case taken together, this meeting cannot help regretting<br />

much that ever this <strong>St</strong>rife and Contention should have been meddled with or that<br />

it had been checked effectually in its Origin…It would have saved the waste <strong>of</strong> a<br />

considerable sum <strong>of</strong> the public money…and it would have tended to the peace<br />

and harmony <strong>of</strong> all the Lodges in Scotland.” 105 Other lodges, however, such as<br />

No. 27 <strong>St</strong> Mungo’s, supported the Grand Lodge. In a minute dated 27 July<br />

1808, No. 27 expressed its approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

conduct <strong>of</strong> the Grand Lodge, in Suppressing every thing that may tend to<br />

prejudice the Brotherhood & most Cordially agree with them in all their<br />

late transactions and resolutions, as far as they have been communicated<br />

to us; and are determined to adhere to, and stand by our Mother Lodge,<br />

in support <strong>of</strong> her rights, which go hand and hand with our own. As On<br />

Our Admission we are all bound to Support the Grand Lodge & <strong>of</strong><br />

course must do it. 106<br />

261<br />

104 According to O’Gorman, “it was during these years that the party and the heir to the throne<br />

began to drift apart. The watershed was the ‘Talents’ ministry, when the Prince resented what he<br />

took to be the ministers’ neglect <strong>of</strong> him. Grenville, in particular, disliked and distrusted him and<br />

was unwilling to fawn over him. After the death <strong>of</strong> Fox relations between the Whig party and<br />

the heir were never the same. Consequently, the Whigs were unable to take advantage <strong>of</strong> no<br />

fewer than four opportunities to enter governments between 1809 and 1812. The events<br />

<strong>of</strong>…1806-07, and the mythology to which they had given rise, had taught the Whigs that they<br />

should never again be victims <strong>of</strong> the court that, therefore, they should only serve in a completely<br />

new administration; that the old one must be declared at an end; and that they should have<br />

ultimate control over men and measures in the new one,” The Long Eighteenth Century: British<br />

Political & Social History 1688-1832 (London, 1997), 265.<br />

105 No. 25 <strong>St</strong> Andrew Lodge Minutes, 27 June 1808.<br />

106 No. 27 <strong>St</strong> Mungo’s Lodge Minutes, 27 July 1808. The Master all stated, “Sir & Brother, The<br />

Communications from the Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> the 10 th <strong>of</strong> March, 10 th May, 17 th June & 16 th July<br />

1808, intimating their proceedings, I duly received and beg leave to return my grateful thanks for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!