05.04.2013 Views

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

entertainment whether they be present or absent and also an equall proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

the Charges <strong>of</strong> the Grand Lodge.” 60<br />

With the exception <strong>of</strong> No. 3 Scoon & Perth, these lodges were operative,<br />

a fact which may support Seggie’s conclusion that jealousies were “rife amongst<br />

the old Operative Lodges.” 61 Initially, at the founding <strong>of</strong> the Grand Lodge,<br />

precedence was determined by the order in which the representatives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

thirty-three lodges in attendance entered the hall. 62 Whereas this question <strong>of</strong><br />

primacy was not particularly significant to the Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> England, it was<br />

<strong>of</strong> paramount importance in Scotland. 63 Freemasons, especially operatives,<br />

intensely coveted their antiquity, and some even viewed the creation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Grand Lodge and the emergence <strong>of</strong> speculative freemasonry in earnest as the<br />

“death-blow given to the operative character <strong>of</strong> masonry in Scotland.” 64 It is<br />

more likely, however, that the gradual waning <strong>of</strong> operative freemasonry was due<br />

in large part to population increase and the rising importance <strong>of</strong> industry and<br />

trading. Indeed, freemasonry gradually outgrew “the narrow machinery <strong>of</strong><br />

government which had suited it so admirably two or three centuries earlier.” 65<br />

Uncertainty ruled the events, as the initial ordering <strong>of</strong> the lodges based<br />

on the sequence <strong>of</strong> entrance was overturned one year later when the Grand<br />

60<br />

No. 8 Journeymen Lodge Minutes, 27 December 1743.<br />

61<br />

Seggie, Journeymen Masons, 46.<br />

62<br />

Lionel Vibert, “The Early Freemasonry <strong>of</strong> England and Scotland,” AQC, 43(1930), 217.<br />

63<br />

Ibid. Referring to the founding four lodges <strong>of</strong> the Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> England, Vibert notes that<br />

they “seem from the very commencement to have settled the order by which they were to stand;<br />

possibly they had traditions to go by…In no single instance did a Lodge come forward and make<br />

claim to a higher place on the roll by reason <strong>of</strong> its having been in existence before its<br />

recognition,” 217. Here again, as the Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> England did not have the quandary <strong>of</strong><br />

satisfying so many different types <strong>of</strong> lodges, the numbering process occurred without<br />

controversy.<br />

64<br />

William Hunter, Incidents in the History <strong>of</strong> the Lodge Journeymen Masons, Edinburgh, No. 8<br />

(Edinburgh, 1884), 63.<br />

65<br />

“The Grand Lodge,” 114, quoting Harry Carr, The Mason and the Burgh (London, 1954), 62.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!