05.04.2013 Views

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

inadmissible, as No. 264 was then not legally under its jurisdiction. 104<br />

Furthermore, as “these degrees <strong>of</strong> Masonry were not sanctioned or authorised by<br />

the Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> Scotland and consequently all <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the Grand<br />

214<br />

Lodge [were] totally strangers to these orders <strong>of</strong> Masonry,” no questions “should<br />

be put to the witness regarding Royal Arch Masonry or Knights Templars.” 105<br />

However, the Grand Lodge did “Find it Competent for Brother McAdam to<br />

prove by witnesses or otherways the charges subsequent to the date <strong>of</strong> the Letter<br />

form the Grand Lodge authorising them to hold meetings under their<br />

authority.” 106<br />

Having effectively vindicated itself, the Grand Lodge then directed<br />

McAdam to provide evidence supporting the allegations <strong>of</strong> misconduct and<br />

sedition by the members <strong>of</strong> No. 264 subsequent to 6 February 1797. 107 Upon his<br />

failure to substantiate such claims, Grand Lodge then heard testimony from<br />

William Hamilton and Quintin <strong>St</strong>ewart, both <strong>of</strong> whom were members <strong>of</strong> No.<br />

264. Each testified that the lodge practiced only the three sanctioned degrees <strong>of</strong><br />

freemasonry, and that Paine’s Age <strong>of</strong> Reason or “anything Pr<strong>of</strong>ane or Immoral,<br />

or any thing inimical to the Church or <strong>St</strong>ate” were all absent from lodge<br />

104 Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> Scotland Minutes, 19 May 1800: “A debate took place as to the Relevancy <strong>of</strong><br />

the Charges now brought and after a considerable discussion the Grand Lodge Found that none<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Charges brought against the Members <strong>of</strong> the Royal Arch Lodge Maybole No. 264 prior to<br />

the 6 th day <strong>of</strong> February 1797 the date <strong>of</strong> the Letter form the Grand Lodge authorising them to<br />

hold Mason Meetings were competent to be the subject <strong>of</strong> Investigation before the Grand Lodge<br />

because till that date they were in no shape under their Jurisdiction.”<br />

105 Ibid.<br />

106 Ibid. See Appendix 6, 19 May 1800 for a full text <strong>of</strong> the entry.<br />

107 Ibid. The full charge reads as follows: “The Grand Lodge Find it Competent for Brother<br />

McAdam to prove by witnesses or otherways the charges subsequent to the date <strong>of</strong> the Letter<br />

form the Grand Lodge authorising them to hold meetings under their authority.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!