05.04.2013 Views

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

its members<br />

Not surprisingly, in a minute dated 24 June 1808, <strong>St</strong> Luke recorded that<br />

had witnessed, with grief and indignation, the conduct <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

individuals belonging to several <strong>of</strong> the sister Lodges <strong>of</strong> this city, who,<br />

finding it impossible to render the Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> Scotland subservient<br />

to their political views, have, with a zeal worthy <strong>of</strong> better cause, exerted<br />

themselves to overturn the controuling power <strong>of</strong> the Grand Lodge, and<br />

subvert the Masonic constitution…Under these circumstances, the<br />

Brethren <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong> Luke’s consider it their bounden duty, to declare their<br />

unshaken fidelity towards the Grand Lodge. 107<br />

Despite varying opinions, it is clear that such actions were consistently<br />

alienating masons. For example, on 18 May 1808, Lodge Edinburgh <strong>St</strong> Andrew<br />

passed a series <strong>of</strong> resolutions stating that the suspensions were an “infringement<br />

upon their rights.” 108 On 13 June 1808, the Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> Scotland expelled<br />

all freemasons involved or associated in any manner with Dr. Mitchell. As a<br />

result, these masons – who were led by No. 1 Mary’s Chapel – <strong>of</strong>ficially<br />

seceded from the Grand Lodge and formed the Associated Lodges Seceding<br />

from the Present Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> Scotland.<br />

Historians have noted that the mishandling <strong>of</strong> the Mitchell Trial caused<br />

further friction among Scottish freemasons. Furthermore, the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

precedence that had dogged the Grand Lodge from its inception in 1736 once<br />

262<br />

the honour done me. All these proceedings have been laid before the Brethren <strong>of</strong> the Lodge <strong>St</strong><br />

Mungo No. 28 over which I have the honour to preside, and while we lament the Schism that has<br />

arisen among the Craft (viz. that when One Misunderstanding is as accommodated, a Wider One<br />

has broke out). We Most Sincerely approve <strong>of</strong> the Conduct <strong>of</strong> the Grand Lodge, in Suppressing<br />

every thing that may tend to prejudice the Brotherhood & most Cordially agree with them in all<br />

their late transactions and resolutions, as far as they have been communicated to us; and are<br />

determined to adhere to, and stand by our Mother Lodge, in support <strong>of</strong> her rights, which go hand<br />

and hand with our own. As On Our Admission we are all bound to Support the Grand Lodge &<br />

<strong>of</strong> course must do it.”<br />

107<br />

No. 44 <strong>St</strong> Luke Lodge Minutes, 24 June 1808, cited in Petition and Complaint, Appendix No.<br />

II, 3.<br />

108<br />

Lodge Edinburgh <strong>St</strong> Andrew Minutes, 18 May 1808, cited in Petition and Complaint, 6-7.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!