05.04.2013 Views

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mark Coleman Wallace PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

two primary witnesses from the Grand Lodge Trial – William Hamilton and<br />

Quintin <strong>St</strong>ewart.<br />

The testimonies <strong>of</strong> both Hamilton and <strong>St</strong>ewart, however, were<br />

completely unlike those previously given under sworn oath at the Grand Lodge<br />

<strong>of</strong> Scotland. Lyon writes that they “made a sweeping disclosure <strong>of</strong> what were<br />

alleged to be the secret ceremonies” <strong>of</strong> Royal Arch and Knights Templar<br />

degrees. 131 Whereas Andrew and Ramsay had declined to reveal the substance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the oaths administered during the ceremonies at No. 264, Hamilton and<br />

<strong>St</strong>ewart readily disclosed the details <strong>of</strong> the rituals. 132 Incredibly, they “suffered<br />

a remarkable resurgence <strong>of</strong> memory after the Masonic trial,” 133 <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

specifics that were otherwise omitted from the Grand Lodge proceedings.<br />

Hamilton gave the following detailed description <strong>of</strong> his admission ceremony<br />

into Lodge Royal Arch Maybole:<br />

222<br />

A pistol was fired and some person called out, ‘Put him to death.’ He<br />

was blindfolded first when brought into the room, and the covering being<br />

afterwards taken from his eyes, he was shown a stone jug in the corner <strong>of</strong><br />

the room, and a candle burning in it. He was told by the panel that it was<br />

the representation <strong>of</strong> God Almighty in the midst <strong>of</strong> the burning bush.<br />

Andrew was Master <strong>of</strong> the Lodge, and was reading the third chapter <strong>of</strong><br />

Exodus. The witness was desired to put <strong>of</strong>f his shoes, as it was holy<br />

ground he stood on; the covering was put down again on the witness’s<br />

face, and he was led under an arch, and, passing under the arch, he was<br />

desired to find the Book <strong>of</strong> the Law; it was taken up by some other<br />

person in the Lodge, who was called High Priest, and who said he would<br />

explain it. The witness was desired to put money on the book to pay for<br />

explaining it to him; the book, he was told, was the Bible. The witness<br />

put money on the book as desired, and John Andrew made observations<br />

on the chapter as he read it, but the witness does not positively remember<br />

any <strong>of</strong> them. Recollects that part <strong>of</strong> the chapter where the children <strong>of</strong><br />

131 Lyon, Mary’s Chapel, 327.<br />

132 Several records, testimonies and verdicts cited by Lyon and Wartski are not available in the<br />

collections at the NAS, most notably Hamilton’s description <strong>of</strong> the admission ceremony.<br />

133 Wartski, “Secret Societies,” 70.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!