Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
sequence dur<strong>in</strong>g a day. We believed that the learners would value the face-toface<br />
mode more highly than the other modes (based on their feedback <strong>and</strong> our<br />
knowledge of their previous learn<strong>in</strong>g experiences). Therefore time spent on the<br />
face-to-face mode needed to outweigh or at least balance the amount of time<br />
spent on the other two modes. We also believed that an equal amount of time<br />
needed to be spent <strong>in</strong> the computer <strong>and</strong> self-study mode as we considered them to<br />
be as beneficial as each other, <strong>and</strong> partly because of logistics <strong>in</strong> terms of space <strong>and</strong><br />
student rotation between the modes. Lastly, we considered the optimal length of the<br />
sessions <strong>in</strong> each mode, which we felt varied accord<strong>in</strong>g to learners’ level. Based on<br />
this rationale, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the fact that the face-to-face mode was the ‘lead mode’,<br />
we devised the timetables for the four levels as seen <strong>in</strong> Table 2.<br />
Table 2: Timetables for the four levels<br />
Elementary <strong>and</strong> Pre-<strong>in</strong>termediate Intermediate <strong>and</strong> Upper-<strong>in</strong>termediate<br />
Duration of session Mode Duration of session Mode<br />
60 m<strong>in</strong>utes Class 90 m<strong>in</strong>utes Class<br />
60 m<strong>in</strong>utes Computer/self-study 45 m<strong>in</strong>utes Computer<br />
60 m<strong>in</strong>utes Class 45 m<strong>in</strong>utes Self-study<br />
60 m<strong>in</strong>utes Self-study/computer 60 m<strong>in</strong>utes Class<br />
60 m<strong>in</strong>utes Class 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes Computer<br />
30 m<strong>in</strong>utes Self-study<br />
<strong>Design</strong><strong>in</strong>g for a suite of courses<br />
In our context a high percentage of the learners worked their way through the levels<br />
often from elementary to graduate from upper-<strong>in</strong>termediate. With these learners<br />
<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d the content <strong>and</strong> design of the course altered <strong>in</strong> an effort to realise their<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased abilities as language learners, to cater for their needs, to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> their<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest, <strong>and</strong> to fulfil our course aims, as <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.<br />
Figure 2: <strong>Course</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> terms of design <strong>and</strong> content<br />
Content<br />
Elementary Upper-<strong>in</strong>termediate<br />
Greater emphasis on military content<br />
Greater learner autonomy<br />
Greater skills focus<br />
<strong>Design</strong><br />
Elementary Upper-<strong>in</strong>termediate<br />
Increased time spent <strong>in</strong> self-study <strong>and</strong> computer modes<br />
Longer classroom sessions<br />
Additional CD-ROMS <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternet access <strong>in</strong> the larger centres<br />
A military blend | 179