Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
What will the <strong>in</strong>teractional patterns be?<br />
Individual, pair <strong>and</strong> group work are all st<strong>and</strong>ard forms of communication <strong>in</strong> the faceto-face<br />
mode of most courses, <strong>and</strong> they can also be found <strong>in</strong> the computer mode<br />
too. Neumeier (2005) identifies 11 <strong>in</strong>teractional patterns for the CALL mode, which<br />
are grouped under three head<strong>in</strong>gs:<br />
■■ <strong>in</strong>teraction through computers/networks (synchronous/asynchronous)<br />
e.g. student to student, teacher/tutor to student<br />
■■ <strong>in</strong>teraction with computers networks, e.g. student <strong>and</strong> teacher/tutor to computer<br />
■■ <strong>in</strong>teraction at computers/networks e.g. student <strong>and</strong> student <strong>in</strong> collaboration<br />
at the computer.<br />
It is easy for a blended learn<strong>in</strong>g course designer to underestimate the number of<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractional patterns that work<strong>in</strong>g with technology presents, <strong>and</strong> I will be the first<br />
to acknowledge that <strong>in</strong> the Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a blend I did. One of the mistakes<br />
I made dur<strong>in</strong>g the redesign process was to remove the need for students to share<br />
computers <strong>and</strong> therefore work together by provid<strong>in</strong>g them with one computer each.<br />
What I believed to be an improvement to the design removed the need for students<br />
to work collaboratively, which to quote Beatty ‘is among the most useful ways <strong>in</strong><br />
which learners acquire language at the computer’ (2003: 99). Keedwell (Chapter 13)<br />
also recognised a design flaw <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>in</strong>teraction patterns <strong>in</strong> his blend: ‘I had<br />
<strong>in</strong>itially visualised the course as a two-way dialogue between tra<strong>in</strong>er <strong>and</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>ee <strong>and</strong><br />
neglected the critical element of peer <strong>in</strong>teraction.’<br />
Other authors recognised different <strong>in</strong>teraction patterns <strong>in</strong> their design, with<br />
Eydelman (Chapter 3) say<strong>in</strong>g ‘…the design of this course allows for a variety of<br />
<strong>in</strong>teraction patterns from those <strong>in</strong>itiated by the teacher to those <strong>in</strong>itiated by the<br />
student(s).’ However, it was the third <strong>in</strong>teraction pattern ‘at the computer’ that<br />
was most commonly referred to <strong>in</strong> the case studies with the key word be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
‘collaboration’. With the exception of four authors the rest referred to collaboration<br />
<strong>in</strong> their case studies <strong>in</strong> a number of different ways, such as:<br />
■■ a key consideration <strong>in</strong> task design (White et al., Chapter 8)<br />
■■ a way to encourage participation (Ingham, Chapter 15)<br />
■■ a way to foster a socio-constructivist approach (Douglas <strong>and</strong> Paton, Chapter 10)<br />
■■ a way for students to learn from each other <strong>and</strong> improve their answers (Ingham,<br />
Chapter 15; Hirst <strong>and</strong> Godfrey, Chapter 9).<br />
What will the learners <strong>and</strong> teachers/tutors roles be?<br />
With<strong>in</strong> any learn<strong>in</strong>g environment teachers <strong>and</strong> learners alike adopt different roles<br />
at different times, which the use of technology further affects. This leads Neumeier<br />
(2005) to speculate that with the <strong>in</strong>troduction of CALL the learners are exposed to<br />
a wider variety of roles than if the course were simply face-to-face. For teachers/<br />
tutors it also means differ<strong>in</strong>g roles between the modes, i.e. classroom teacher <strong>and</strong><br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e tutor.<br />
The change <strong>in</strong> roles was recognised <strong>in</strong> a number of the case studies, with Aborisade<br />
(Chapter 2) summ<strong>in</strong>g it up by stat<strong>in</strong>g ‘We have learned that teacher roles are<br />
236<br />
| Conclusion