14.04.2013 Views

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The students were taken to the computer laboratory for one hour bi-weekly after the<br />

study began. In the lab sessions, students were supposed to work on the assigned<br />

resources <strong>and</strong> ask for help with the technical problems they faced <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g MEC.<br />

The lab sessions were useful <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g students solve technical problems <strong>and</strong><br />

encourag<strong>in</strong>g them to use MEC. At the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the study, most of the problems<br />

students had <strong>in</strong>volved how to use certa<strong>in</strong> features of MEC. Later <strong>in</strong> these sessions,<br />

student focused on us<strong>in</strong>g the resources they wanted.<br />

One of the aims of blend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this study was to compensate for learner differences<br />

<strong>and</strong> needs <strong>in</strong> experience with content, realis<strong>in</strong>g that some students had prior<br />

experience with the material <strong>and</strong>, thus, might not have to review the material as<br />

much as others. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, a student could receive additional <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

<strong>and</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g through extra onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g programmes while still attend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>-class<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with other students. Students who needed more practice could have that<br />

opportunity without tak<strong>in</strong>g face-to-face class time away from those who might not<br />

need the extra practice. This created a more learner-centered environment by<br />

address<strong>in</strong>g vary<strong>in</strong>g learn<strong>in</strong>g styles or needs.<br />

Another goal of blend<strong>in</strong>g over us<strong>in</strong>g any s<strong>in</strong>gle learn<strong>in</strong>g delivery mode was to have<br />

two major modes <strong>and</strong> environments, onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> face-to-face delivery, <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g process. In this study, learners had a larger space to learn <strong>and</strong> teachers to<br />

teach more effectively. They were not conf<strong>in</strong>ed to class boundaries any more. While<br />

teachers could help students any time by send<strong>in</strong>g extra resources, students could<br />

access the materials at any time of day <strong>and</strong> review them as needed, which provided<br />

them with <strong>in</strong>creased flexibility. In-class teach<strong>in</strong>g on its own requires learners to<br />

participate <strong>in</strong> lessons at a fixed time, which limits the access. However, learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

does not occur only <strong>in</strong> class. In this study, apart from the class <strong>in</strong>struction, learners<br />

could reach learn<strong>in</strong>g materials <strong>and</strong> teachers via MEC outside the class.<br />

Results, implications <strong>and</strong> conclusion<br />

The study aimed to explore the effects of an onl<strong>in</strong>e LMS called MEC on Turkish EFL<br />

preparatory students’ achievement <strong>and</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>in</strong> ITU School of Foreign <strong>Language</strong>s.<br />

The data for achievement was collected through the pre-test, progress test, <strong>and</strong><br />

post-test. In all of these tests, students were tested on listen<strong>in</strong>g, grammar, vocabulary<br />

<strong>and</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g. These tests were adm<strong>in</strong>istered to both classes on the same day <strong>and</strong><br />

at the same time. The listen<strong>in</strong>g sections of the tests were <strong>in</strong> the form of note-tak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The students were given note-tak<strong>in</strong>g sheets to take notes before the exam booklets<br />

were distributed. Students answered the listen<strong>in</strong>g questions based on their notes.<br />

Grammar was tested with multiple choice cloze tests except for the pre-test <strong>in</strong> which<br />

it was tested with discrete multiple choice items. As for the read<strong>in</strong>g sections, students<br />

read a text <strong>and</strong> answered questions based on it. In the vocabulary section, students<br />

chose the correct word from a list of words to fill <strong>in</strong> the blanks <strong>in</strong> given sentences.<br />

In order to f<strong>in</strong>d out any pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g difference <strong>in</strong> achievement, the pre-test scores<br />

were compared <strong>and</strong> revealed no statistical difference between the experimental<br />

class <strong>and</strong> the control class (t(58) =1.984, p= .052). Later, the scores of the pre-test,<br />

progress test <strong>and</strong> post test were analysed to f<strong>in</strong>d out whether MEC had an effect<br />

on the achievement of students. The analysis of the test results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the<br />

Students’ CALL<strong>in</strong>g | 209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!