14.04.2013 Views

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conclusion<br />

In this chapter a list of blended learn<strong>in</strong>g design-related questions will be presented<br />

for course designers to consider when develop<strong>in</strong>g their courses. The questions<br />

have arisen from the advice on blended learn<strong>in</strong>g course design that is presented<br />

<strong>in</strong> the literature <strong>and</strong> from the experiences of the authors <strong>in</strong> this publication, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

my own. The questions will be presented under four head<strong>in</strong>gs (context; course<br />

design; learners, teachers <strong>and</strong> tutors; <strong>and</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g the blend),<br />

with examples drawn from the case studies provid<strong>in</strong>g suggested answers or<br />

guidance for each.<br />

A pr<strong>in</strong>cipled approach to blended learn<strong>in</strong>g course design<br />

The Introduction to this book concluded by stress<strong>in</strong>g the importance of gett<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

blend ‘right’, whilst at the same time acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g that ‘determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the right blend<br />

isn’t easy or to be taken lightly’ (Hofmann, 2001: 3). Despite these words of warn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the literature provides us with a limited amount of advice on how to blend <strong>and</strong><br />

simply suggests that we approach it <strong>in</strong> a pr<strong>in</strong>cipled way (Neumeier, 2005; Levy <strong>and</strong><br />

Stockwell, 2006; Sharma, 2006; Mayes <strong>and</strong> de Freitas, 2007) because if we do not ‘a<br />

course … may be seen as an “eclectic” blend<strong>in</strong>g together of course components <strong>and</strong><br />

can end up as rather a mish-mash’ Sharma <strong>and</strong> Barrett (2007: 8). Therefore, to ensure<br />

that this does not happen <strong>and</strong> to achieve a pr<strong>in</strong>cipled approach to design <strong>in</strong> relation<br />

to <strong>English</strong> <strong>Language</strong> Teach<strong>in</strong>g (ELT), Sharma <strong>and</strong> Barrett (2007) suggest that course<br />

designers follow four guid<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples (outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the Introduction). Also Dudeney<br />

<strong>and</strong> Hockly (2007) propose a list of questions under five head<strong>in</strong>gs (delivery mode;<br />

task design <strong>and</strong> materials; learners; teacher/tutors; assessment <strong>and</strong> evaluation),<br />

which acts as a checklist of key considerations, but does not suggest answers or<br />

provide examples from blends.<br />

Although helpful to a degree, when I was redesign<strong>in</strong>g the Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a<br />

blend (Chapter 16) I did not f<strong>in</strong>d this advice detailed enough to guide me <strong>and</strong><br />

moreover I was frustrated by the lack of descriptions of blends <strong>in</strong> ELT contexts. It<br />

was rather belatedly <strong>in</strong> the redesign process that I discovered Neumeier’s (2005)<br />

framework of parameters, which orig<strong>in</strong>ated from the design of a 33-hour job<br />

application course <strong>in</strong> a German university (see Table 1). The aim of this short course<br />

(73 per cent of which was taught onl<strong>in</strong>e) was to teach the students how to apply for<br />

a job <strong>in</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>and</strong> the course’s primary focus was on writ<strong>in</strong>g (CVs <strong>and</strong> cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />

letters) <strong>and</strong> to a lesser degree speak<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong>terviews). Neumeier (2005: 176) hoped<br />

this framework could act as the start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for design<strong>in</strong>g a blended learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environment for language teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> that it would ‘help course<br />

designers <strong>and</strong> practitioners to move closer to answer<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial question of which<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation provides the optimal basis for language learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g given the<br />

particular conditions at h<strong>and</strong>.’<br />

Conclusion | 225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!