14.04.2013 Views

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

■■ The onl<strong>in</strong>e modules are never perfect – they can be improved all the time. It is<br />

reasonable to evaluate not how perfect they are but to what extent they help <strong>in</strong><br />

reach<strong>in</strong>g the learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g further adaptations of the onl<strong>in</strong>e modules are envisaged:<br />

■■ make it possible for learners to start work<strong>in</strong>g with the system from various parts<br />

(some learners already know structures <strong>and</strong> have draft models)<br />

■■ reduce the time necessary for perform<strong>in</strong>g a task, thus decreas<strong>in</strong>g the required<br />

level of concentration<br />

■■ make it possible for learners to benefit from collaboration with other learners<br />

through discuss<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs with them/do<strong>in</strong>g tasks related to their work<br />

■■ <strong>in</strong>crease the system effect of the site by improv<strong>in</strong>g connections between various<br />

systems, for example it should be possible for learners to use parts of the models<br />

developed for one system when work<strong>in</strong>g on the other<br />

■■ <strong>in</strong>troduce additional tasks that help learners underst<strong>and</strong> that they are improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(measur<strong>in</strong>g by tests only is not enough).<br />

Lessons learned <strong>and</strong> advice<br />

The lessons learned as a result of work with the blend are presented through the<br />

contradictions we faced. If a successful solution was found, it is presented here<br />

as well.<br />

Contradiction 1<br />

The design of the onl<strong>in</strong>e modules required high concentration from the learners.<br />

At the same time, their concentration was low as most of them do 101 th<strong>in</strong>gs when<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g onl<strong>in</strong>e (we found this to be a general trend among the learners irrespective<br />

of how engag<strong>in</strong>g the task was).<br />

Solution 1<br />

Not solved dur<strong>in</strong>g the period described.<br />

Conceptual solution: each task offered to learners requires low concentration as it<br />

can be done fairly quickly, however, all tasks together require high concentration.<br />

Recommendation 1<br />

Each task <strong>in</strong> the course should be short enough to ensure that learners can cope<br />

with it without be<strong>in</strong>g distracted <strong>in</strong> the process.<br />

Contradiction 2<br />

Tasks offered to learners should be easy enough so as not to discourage them<br />

<strong>and</strong> they should be difficult enough to ensure that there is room for the development<br />

of th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Solution 2<br />

Tasks are difficult when learners work alone <strong>and</strong> they are easy when they work<br />

as a group dur<strong>in</strong>g the classroom sessions.<br />

196 | A th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g-based blended learn<strong>in</strong>g course

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!