Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
■■ The onl<strong>in</strong>e modules are never perfect – they can be improved all the time. It is<br />
reasonable to evaluate not how perfect they are but to what extent they help <strong>in</strong><br />
reach<strong>in</strong>g the learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives.<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g further adaptations of the onl<strong>in</strong>e modules are envisaged:<br />
■■ make it possible for learners to start work<strong>in</strong>g with the system from various parts<br />
(some learners already know structures <strong>and</strong> have draft models)<br />
■■ reduce the time necessary for perform<strong>in</strong>g a task, thus decreas<strong>in</strong>g the required<br />
level of concentration<br />
■■ make it possible for learners to benefit from collaboration with other learners<br />
through discuss<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs with them/do<strong>in</strong>g tasks related to their work<br />
■■ <strong>in</strong>crease the system effect of the site by improv<strong>in</strong>g connections between various<br />
systems, for example it should be possible for learners to use parts of the models<br />
developed for one system when work<strong>in</strong>g on the other<br />
■■ <strong>in</strong>troduce additional tasks that help learners underst<strong>and</strong> that they are improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(measur<strong>in</strong>g by tests only is not enough).<br />
Lessons learned <strong>and</strong> advice<br />
The lessons learned as a result of work with the blend are presented through the<br />
contradictions we faced. If a successful solution was found, it is presented here<br />
as well.<br />
Contradiction 1<br />
The design of the onl<strong>in</strong>e modules required high concentration from the learners.<br />
At the same time, their concentration was low as most of them do 101 th<strong>in</strong>gs when<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g onl<strong>in</strong>e (we found this to be a general trend among the learners irrespective<br />
of how engag<strong>in</strong>g the task was).<br />
Solution 1<br />
Not solved dur<strong>in</strong>g the period described.<br />
Conceptual solution: each task offered to learners requires low concentration as it<br />
can be done fairly quickly, however, all tasks together require high concentration.<br />
Recommendation 1<br />
Each task <strong>in</strong> the course should be short enough to ensure that learners can cope<br />
with it without be<strong>in</strong>g distracted <strong>in</strong> the process.<br />
Contradiction 2<br />
Tasks offered to learners should be easy enough so as not to discourage them<br />
<strong>and</strong> they should be difficult enough to ensure that there is room for the development<br />
of th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Solution 2<br />
Tasks are difficult when learners work alone <strong>and</strong> they are easy when they work<br />
as a group dur<strong>in</strong>g the classroom sessions.<br />
196 | A th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g-based blended learn<strong>in</strong>g course