14.04.2013 Views

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Generally speak<strong>in</strong>g though, very tech-savvy participants will complete tasks <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

the course easier than those with no ICT experience whatsoever. What this means <strong>in</strong><br />

practice is that unskilled participants take longer to complete tasks, <strong>and</strong> need more<br />

h<strong>and</strong>s-on support from the tutor <strong>and</strong> the rest of the group. Less technically proficient<br />

participants are often aware of the skills gap if they take a course with more proficient<br />

colleagues. However, the face-to-face component enables supportive group work<br />

from the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the course, <strong>and</strong> can help these participants feel more secure.<br />

Here is one (less skilled) participant’s take on this <strong>in</strong> her course feedback:<br />

I was often amazed at how those who knew more never seemed to m<strong>in</strong>d help<strong>in</strong>g<br />

out people like me <strong>and</strong> often wondered if they felt that they regretted sign<strong>in</strong>g up<br />

for this course. One day, I asked two of them <strong>and</strong> they immediately said, ‘No way!’<br />

<strong>and</strong> went on to say that they felt that they had learned/were learn<strong>in</strong>g A LOT!<br />

The tutors<br />

All of our courses, whether offered fully onl<strong>in</strong>e, or <strong>in</strong> blended versions, have a<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum of six participants <strong>and</strong> a maximum of 15 participants. This is partly because<br />

of the nature of our courses that are all h<strong>and</strong>s-on, <strong>and</strong> task-based. In other words,<br />

participants work <strong>in</strong>dividually, <strong>in</strong> pairs <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> small groups <strong>and</strong> prepare a significant<br />

number of outputs dur<strong>in</strong>g a course. The h<strong>and</strong>s-on nature of our courses means that<br />

the tutor workload is high. Typically, for one hour of onl<strong>in</strong>e work, we calculate 1.5<br />

hours of tutor support for a group. For one hour of face-to-face work, the ratio may<br />

be two hours of tutor work (at least) if we <strong>in</strong>clude preparation time.<br />

In addition, we assign one tutor for a s<strong>in</strong>gle group of six to ten participants. If the<br />

group has 11 to 15 participants, there are two tutors, with one tak<strong>in</strong>g the lead role<br />

(about 60 –70 per cent of the workload), <strong>and</strong> the other play<strong>in</strong>g a support role (30 – 40<br />

per cent of the workload). Aga<strong>in</strong>, this is due to the <strong>in</strong>creased workload for tutors with<br />

larger groups, due to the additional one-to-one support that onl<strong>in</strong>e courses need<br />

to provide to participants, especially <strong>in</strong> the area of technology, where teachers may<br />

have little or no experience.<br />

<strong>Course</strong> design <strong>and</strong> delivery<br />

With the blended Cert ICT, the tutor can deal with larger groups <strong>in</strong> the face-to-face<br />

component, with up to 20 participants <strong>in</strong> one face-to-face group. However, for the<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e component a large group of 20 is split <strong>in</strong>to two separate onl<strong>in</strong>e groups of ten,<br />

each with its own tutor. The fundamental design issue here is that onl<strong>in</strong>e tutor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(at least for h<strong>and</strong>s-on, task-based courses that require a great deal of <strong>in</strong>teraction/<br />

communication) can significantly <strong>in</strong>crease a tutor’s workload. The onl<strong>in</strong>e version of<br />

a face-to-face course may mean more work for a teacher – if the job is go<strong>in</strong>g to be<br />

done well. This is a fundamental issue when consider<strong>in</strong>g blended learn<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> one<br />

that we f<strong>in</strong>d many <strong>in</strong>stitutions do not seem to be aware of. Clearly it has important<br />

implications for staff hours <strong>and</strong> cost<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Because all our courses are offered onl<strong>in</strong>e, typically we have teachers from all<br />

over the world, work<strong>in</strong>g closely together onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> groups, for the duration of their<br />

course. The blended version of the Cert ICT, however, tends to attract participants<br />

who live locally to where the face-to-face component of the course is be<strong>in</strong>g run.<br />

Revers<strong>in</strong>g the blend: From onl<strong>in</strong>e to blended | 77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!