Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Lessons learned<br />
When decid<strong>in</strong>g what part of a teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g course to offer onl<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>and</strong> what parts<br />
face-to-face, we f<strong>in</strong>d it makes sense to offer the most practical/h<strong>and</strong>s-on elements<br />
of course content face-to-face. More theoretical discussions can easily take place<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e, for example via asynchronous forum discussions. In fact, it has been argued<br />
that onl<strong>in</strong>e asynchronous forum discussions lead to more thoughtful contributions:<br />
…asynchronous discussions allow for a higher level of cognitive questions that<br />
encourage critical th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g. Learners have more time to process questions <strong>and</strong><br />
develop responses, <strong>and</strong> the learner’s cognitive level of response often matches<br />
the cognitive level of the questions asked. Higher level cognitive <strong>and</strong> affective<br />
questions encourage learners to <strong>in</strong>terpret, analyse, evaluate, <strong>in</strong>fer, expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
self regulate.<br />
(Walker, 2005)<br />
We also learned that it makes sense to <strong>in</strong>troduce the VLE either before or early <strong>in</strong> the<br />
face-to-face component, rather than spr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g it on participants just before they are<br />
go<strong>in</strong>g to start the onl<strong>in</strong>e component. In other words, the <strong>in</strong>troduction of the onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
platform is scaffolded.<br />
We learned that the use of a VLE <strong>in</strong> the face-to-face part works best as a repository,<br />
or for shar<strong>in</strong>g outputs that are created. It doesn’t make much sense to have<br />
participants complet<strong>in</strong>g extra tasks at home <strong>in</strong> the VLE dur<strong>in</strong>g our face-to-face<br />
component, when we have a clearly separate 70-hour onl<strong>in</strong>e component to follow.<br />
One key question we have considered is whether the blended learn<strong>in</strong>g approach<br />
for the Cert ICT is more beneficial to the learners than the fully onl<strong>in</strong>e approach.<br />
We have come to the conclusion that it is extremely difficult to make comparisons<br />
between these two modes, because they are so different. Of major importance<br />
are participants’ attitudes towards the blended versus onl<strong>in</strong>e approach, as we<br />
have seen above. Although the blended course participants claim that they would<br />
have found the onl<strong>in</strong>e component difficult or impossible without a previous faceto-face<br />
component, the reality is that participants on our fully onl<strong>in</strong>e component<br />
have no such difficulty; <strong>in</strong>deed onl<strong>in</strong>e participants have no face-to-face component<br />
experience with which to compare. Feedback on the fully onl<strong>in</strong>e version of the same<br />
course is equally positive, <strong>and</strong> frequently <strong>in</strong>cludes surprise <strong>and</strong> praise for the very<br />
supportive onl<strong>in</strong>e group dynamic that is developed:<br />
Interaction with colleagues was great overall. Initial fears about onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
were quickly dispelled.<br />
Interaction with colleagues was excellent. Maybe ours was just a good group, but<br />
it worked very well. I found everyone very helpful <strong>and</strong> supportive. Certa<strong>in</strong>ly some<br />
‘friendships’ arose between participants, where <strong>in</strong>terests, help, advice, experience<br />
<strong>and</strong> support all played their parts. A virtual classroom also has an atmosphere.<br />
At the same time the fully onl<strong>in</strong>e participants were aware of some of the challenges<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e communication, for example when this <strong>in</strong>volved pair work:<br />
80 | Revers<strong>in</strong>g the blend: From onl<strong>in</strong>e to blended