25.04.2013 Views

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Criteria contained<br />

in subsections 5(1)<br />

and 5(2) of Act<br />

162<br />

4 DIVORCE ON THE GROUND OF MENTAL ILLNESS OR CONTINUOUS<br />

UNCONSCIOUSNESS Ð SECTION 5<br />

Two fur<strong>the</strong>r grounds for divorce, namely mental illness and continuous<br />

unconsciousness, are dealt with in section 5 of <strong>the</strong> Divorce Act 70 of 1979<br />

and discussed on pages 122±124 of <strong>the</strong> textbook.<br />

The circumstances which <strong>the</strong> plaintiff must prove in order <strong>to</strong> obtain a<br />

divorce on <strong>the</strong> ground of <strong>the</strong> defendant's mental illness (s 5(1)) or<br />

continuous unconsciousness (s 5(2)) are clearly set out in your textbook on<br />

pages 122±123. You must know what <strong>the</strong>se circumstances are.<br />

5 THE CONNECTION BETWEEN SECTION 4 AND SECTION 5<br />

This matter is discussed only briefly on page 123 of your textbook under<br />

<strong>the</strong> heading ``11.3.2 Divorcing a mentally ill or unconscious spouse in<br />

terms of section 4 instead of section 5''. However, it is discussed in<br />

detail on pages 196±197 (<strong>the</strong> note on Smit v Smit) of your prescribed<br />

casebook. You must <strong>study</strong> this section of your casebook carefully. Make<br />

sure that you know what <strong>the</strong> issue is and how this issue was addressed in<br />

Dickinson v Dickinson, Krige v Smit, Smit v Smit (a quo and full bench<br />

decisions) and Ott v Raubenheimer. In this regard you must also know <strong>the</strong><br />

points of view of Barnard and Hahlo.<br />

ACTIVITY<br />

Mr and Mrs Naidoo married five years ago. While on a mountain climbing<br />

expedition three years ago, Mrs Naidoo fell from a mountain ledge and hit<br />

her head against a rock. Mrs Naidoo has been unconscious since <strong>the</strong>n. Mr<br />

Naidoo now wants <strong>to</strong> divorce Mrs Naidoo. Mr Naidoo asks you if he can<br />

apply for a divorce in terms of section 5(2) of <strong>the</strong> Divorce Act 70 of 1979,<br />

or whe<strong>the</strong>r he can also make use of section 4 of <strong>the</strong> Act. Advise Mr Naidoo<br />

about this. Substantiate your answer by referring <strong>to</strong> authority.<br />

FEEDBACK<br />

This matter deals with <strong>the</strong> connection between sections 4 and 5 of <strong>the</strong><br />

Divorce Act 70 of 1979. There are many o<strong>the</strong>r circumstances which can<br />

lead <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> irretrievable breakdown of a marriage, which are not provided<br />

forbysection5of<strong>the</strong>Act.In<strong>the</strong>caseofmentalillnessandcontinuous<br />

unconsciousness <strong>the</strong> legislature thought it fit <strong>to</strong> lay down certain rules.<br />

Consequently <strong>the</strong> question arises whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> requirements of section 5<br />

always have <strong>to</strong> be complied with if one of <strong>the</strong> spouses is mentally ill or<br />

unconscious or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> applicant has a choice of using section 4 or<br />

section 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!