25.04.2013 Views

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In Petersen v Maintenance Officer <strong>the</strong> Cape provincial division of <strong>the</strong> high<br />

court declared this rule unconstitutional on <strong>the</strong> ground that it<br />

unjustifiably violated <strong>the</strong> extra-marital child's right not be unfairly<br />

discriminated against on <strong>the</strong> ground of birth and his or her right <strong>to</strong><br />

dignity, and failed <strong>to</strong> afford paramountcy <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> child's best interests.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> light of <strong>the</strong> aforementioned, Mr and Mrs Nel will (<strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with Britney's parents) be liable for Tim's maintenance.<br />

Siblings If nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> child's parents nor his or her grandparents are in a position<br />

<strong>to</strong> support <strong>the</strong> child, <strong>the</strong> duty of support passes <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> child's siblings<br />

according <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir respective means, provided that <strong>the</strong> sibling who claims<br />

maintenance is indigent.<br />

Stepparents Note that, at common law, a stepparent is not obliged <strong>to</strong> maintain his or<br />

her stepchild, as <strong>the</strong> duty <strong>to</strong> support rests on blood relationship, and not<br />

affinity. However, in Heystek v Heystek <strong>the</strong> court held that a stepparent does<br />

have a duty of support in respect of his or her stepchild. The decision is<br />

wrong in so far as <strong>the</strong> court held that marriage in community of property,<br />

<strong>the</strong> existence of a common household and consortium omnis vitae with <strong>the</strong><br />

child's mo<strong>the</strong>r render <strong>the</strong> stepfa<strong>the</strong>r liable for his stepchild's support. In<br />

this regard you must see <strong>the</strong> criticism of Heystek v Heystek on pages 293±<br />

294 of your textbook. There it is pointed out that <strong>the</strong> only part of <strong>the</strong><br />

decision in Heystek v Heystek which may provide a valid basis for conferring<br />

a duty of support on a stepparent is <strong>the</strong> court's view that <strong>the</strong> child's right<br />

<strong>to</strong> parental care gives <strong>the</strong> child a right <strong>to</strong> claim maintenance from his or<br />

her stepparent. If this part of <strong>the</strong> decision is correct, it means that <strong>the</strong><br />

Constitution has created a duty of support between stepparent and<br />

stepchild. Thus, for <strong>the</strong> latter reason, it may be that a stepparent is now<br />

obliged <strong>to</strong> support his or her stepchild. Time will tell whe<strong>the</strong>r o<strong>the</strong>r courts<br />

will be prepared <strong>to</strong> accept <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong>re is a duty of support between<br />

stepparent and stepchild.<br />

278<br />

2 THE SCOPE OF THE DUTY OF SUPPORT<br />

Nextyouhave<strong>to</strong><strong>study</strong><strong>the</strong>ruleson<strong>the</strong>scopeof<strong>the</strong>duty<strong>to</strong>supporta<br />

child. These rules are set out on pages 294±295 of <strong>the</strong> textbook.<br />

3 ENFORCEMENT OF THE DUTY OF SUPPORT<br />

In <strong>study</strong> unit 8 above we very briefly and superficially dealt with<br />

enforcement of maintenance. That discussion dealt specifically with<br />

enforcement of maintenance between spouses. On page 295 of <strong>the</strong><br />

textbook you will see that <strong>the</strong> same principles which govern enforcement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!