key to the study guide - Name
key to the study guide - Name
key to the study guide - Name
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Persons already<br />
married<br />
2.3 Lawfulness<br />
A marriage is not valid unless it is lawful for <strong>the</strong> parties <strong>to</strong> marry.<br />
On page 30 of your textbook it is explained that a man or a woman who is<br />
already married cannot take a second spouse while <strong>the</strong> marriage still exists.<br />
It is important <strong>to</strong> remember that this rule only applies <strong>to</strong> civil marriages.<br />
On page 30 of <strong>the</strong> textbook it is pointed out that in our country many<br />
people marry in terms of o<strong>the</strong>r systems of law which permit a man <strong>to</strong> take<br />
more than one wife.<br />
Persons of same sex You will fur<strong>the</strong>r see on page 30 of <strong>the</strong> textbook that a man may not marry<br />
a man, and a woman may not marry a woman. In this regard, you should<br />
take note of <strong>the</strong> supreme court of appeal's decision in Fourie v Minister of<br />
Home Affairs 2005 (3) BCLR 241 (SCA), which was delivered after<br />
publication of Cronje and Hea<strong>to</strong>n's work, South African family law. In<br />
Fourie, <strong>the</strong> supreme court of appeal held that <strong>the</strong> common-law definition<br />
of ``marriage'' was unconstitutional <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent that it restricted<br />
marriage <strong>to</strong> persons of <strong>the</strong> opposite sex. The court developed <strong>the</strong> definition<br />
<strong>to</strong> open up marriage <strong>to</strong> persons of <strong>the</strong> same sex. The court expressly added<br />
that same-sex couples must meet <strong>the</strong> requirements set by <strong>the</strong> Marriage Act<br />
25 of 1961 for a valid marriage. As <strong>the</strong> prescribed marriage formula in <strong>the</strong><br />
Marriage Act refers <strong>to</strong> ``husband'' and ``wife'' same-sex couples can still<br />
not be married by a marriage officer who uses that particular marriage<br />
formula. The Marriage Act however allows marriage officers who are<br />
ministers of religion or who hold a responsible position in a religious<br />
denomination or organisation <strong>to</strong> follow <strong>the</strong> marriage formula which is<br />
usually observed by that denomination or organisation if <strong>the</strong> particular<br />
formula has been approved by <strong>the</strong> Minister of Home Affairs. In <strong>the</strong> past,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Minister of Home Affairs refused <strong>to</strong> approve marriage formulae that<br />
referred <strong>to</strong> same-sex couples. Once a religious denomination or organisation<br />
has acquired <strong>the</strong> Minister's approval of its marriage formula it will be<br />
able <strong>to</strong> marry same-sex couples. No religious denomination or organisation<br />
will however be compelled <strong>to</strong> marry same-sex couples. Until such time as<br />
<strong>the</strong> Marriage Act is amended same-sex couples who do not wish <strong>to</strong> have a<br />
religious marriage ceremony will not be able <strong>to</strong> get married. (The supreme<br />
court of appeal did not consider <strong>the</strong> constitutionality of <strong>the</strong> marriage<br />
formula in <strong>the</strong> Marriage Act, as <strong>the</strong> parties did not dispute <strong>the</strong><br />
constitutionality of <strong>the</strong> Act.) This state of affairs clearly amounts <strong>to</strong><br />
inequality before <strong>the</strong> law and unequal protection and benefit of <strong>the</strong> law,<br />
which violates section 9 of <strong>the</strong> Constitution. However, <strong>the</strong> position may<br />
soon change, as <strong>the</strong> Minister of Home Affairs has lodged an appeal against<br />
<strong>the</strong> supreme court of appeal's decision.<br />
Marriage of transsexual<br />
On page 31 your textbook fur<strong>the</strong>r explains <strong>the</strong> difficulties which arise in<br />
respect of validity when a person who has undergone a sex-change<br />
operation marries.<br />
47