25.04.2013 Views

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

key to the study guide - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

252<br />

In <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong> Minister of Home Affairs refused <strong>to</strong> approve marriage<br />

formulae that referred <strong>to</strong> same-sex couples. Once a religious denomination<br />

or organisation has acquired <strong>the</strong> Minister's approval of its marriage<br />

formula it will be able <strong>to</strong> marry same-sex couples. No religious<br />

denomination or organisation will however be compelled <strong>to</strong> marry samesex<br />

couples. Until <strong>the</strong> Marriage Act is amended same-sex couples who do<br />

not wish <strong>to</strong> have a religious marriage ceremony will not be able <strong>to</strong> get<br />

married. (The supreme court of appeal did not consider <strong>the</strong> constitutionality<br />

of <strong>the</strong> marriage formula in <strong>the</strong> Marriage Act, as <strong>the</strong> parties did not<br />

dispute <strong>the</strong> constitutionality of <strong>the</strong> Act.) This state of affairs clearly<br />

amounts <strong>to</strong> inequality before <strong>the</strong> law and unequal protection and benefit<br />

of <strong>the</strong> law, which violates section 9 of <strong>the</strong> Constitution. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

position may soon change, as <strong>the</strong> Minister of Home Affairs has lodged an<br />

appeal against <strong>the</strong> supreme court of appeal's decision.<br />

ACTIVITY<br />

John and William have been living <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r as life partners for 10 years<br />

and wish <strong>to</strong> get married now. They want <strong>to</strong> know from you if <strong>the</strong>y can<br />

conclude a valid marriage. Advise <strong>the</strong>m on this matter.<br />

FEEDBACK<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> decision in Fourie v Minister of Home Affairs dealt only with <strong>the</strong><br />

common-law definition of marriage and not with <strong>the</strong> marriage formula in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Marriage Act which refers <strong>to</strong> ``husband'' and ``wife'', John and William<br />

can still not conclude a valid marriage. The Marriage Act however allows<br />

marriage officers who are ministers of religion or who hold a responsible<br />

position in a religious denomination or organisation <strong>to</strong> follow <strong>the</strong> marriage<br />

formula which is usually observed by that denomination or organisation if<br />

<strong>the</strong> particular formula has been approved by <strong>the</strong> Minister of Home Affairs.<br />

Therefore, if a religious denomination or organisation obtains <strong>the</strong><br />

Minister's approval of a marriage formula which makes provision for<br />

same-sex couples John and William will indeed be able <strong>to</strong> conclude a valid<br />

marriage. A constitutional attack on <strong>the</strong> Marriage Act's prohibition on<br />

same-sex marriage would probably also be successful, as such prohibition<br />

clearly violates gay and lesbian persons' rights <strong>to</strong> equality, dignity and<br />

privacy.<br />

QUESTIONS<br />

NB: Make sure that you can answer <strong>the</strong>se questions properly. They<br />

are designed <strong>to</strong> test your knowledge of <strong>the</strong> <strong>study</strong> material in<br />

this <strong>study</strong> unit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!